This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hmm.. This article should discuss the city's Civilian Police Review Authority, since slashing its budget is arguably the worst thing he's done (I'm pretty sure he's said so himself). — User:Mulad (talk) 22:44, May 8, 2005 (UTC)
This page is just a fan letter to R.T., someone should change it into a neutral article since it's almost useless in its present form...
Which specific sections do you disagree with? --mt
Is there still any reason for the POV tag? I haven't seen any justifications given for the POV tag. The objections to the article as it stands may be legitimate concerns, but they aren't POV concerns.-- RLent ( talk) 14:49, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
I'm doing POV tag cleanup. As there is no reply to the above statement for quite a long time, I'll take that as a consensus and remove the tag. Of course, it can be returned by anyone who wishes to state their reasoning here in the discussion page. I'm not making a value judgement, acting upon what appears a consensus here. Jjdon ( talk) 20:32, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
Update Article doesn't "suck" as much anymore. It's in a better condition at least. There really isn't much else to talk about Rybak other than what is here. .:davumaya:. 18:23, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 22:18, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 3 external links on
R. T. Rybak. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 18:05, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:R. T. Rybak/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.
Hello. Infobox has been added to raise this from a Stub to Start class biography. The flags for cleanup, point of view and suitability for an encyclopedia will need to be addressed. See also steps for reaching a B class biography. Best wishes. - Susanlesch 15:09, 13 January 2007 (UTC) minor edit at 03:00 |
Last edited at 03:00, 14 January 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 03:44, 30 April 2016 (UTC)