This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to
join the project and
contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the
documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mongols, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Mongol culture, history, language, and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MongolsWikipedia:WikiProject MongolsTemplate:WikiProject MongolsMongols articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a
list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the
full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Although, princes from House of Khasar did not have right to become a khan, they were powerful and protected Great khans. One prince died while protecting Togan temur from Red turbans.--
Enerelt (
talk)
01:05, 23 June 2008 (UTC)reply
Requested Move
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a
move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Question: Is it?
These seem to be some relevant English-language sources which use the current spelling. Could you please show that "Qasar" is indeed more common than "Hasar"? --
RJFF (
talk)
07:59, 16 October 2012 (UTC)reply
"Hasar" in your search returns 262 results. "Qasar" returns
"about 2500", and "Khasar" gives
"about 1470". In addition, the major sources (Ratchnevsky, Lister, Grousset, Weatherford, &c.) all use either Q or Kh; none use the "H" spelling.
siafu (
talk)
16:31, 16 October 2012 (UTC)reply
Support Taking an unscientific sample of eight books on the shelves in my university library, I see equal support for Q and K. I actually didn't see any Kh or H, and there was one instance of "Kassar." But the three books from this century all use Q, so that works for me as a tiebreaker. --
BDD (
talk)
18:45, 16 October 2012 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a
move review. No further edits should be made to this section.