This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cuba, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Cuba related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CubaWikipedia:WikiProject CubaTemplate:WikiProject CubaCuba articles
The following is a closed discussion of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a
move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Cuban revolutionary propaganda →
Propaganda in Cuba – Propaganda in Foo country rather than Fooian propaganda is the standard name for articles in Category:Propaganda by country. This is the only odd duck in that category tree. Now, granted, this article focuses on propaganda in Cuba from the revolutionary times onward, but when most people think "Propaganda in Cuba", they reasonably think of the communist/Castro regimes, not of the now-mostly-forgotten pre-Castro government. I think this article would be much better as Propaganda in Cuba, and if someone wants I am sure it can have the lead slightly changed and a section on pre-revolutionary propaganda added eventually. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus|
reply here 08:00, 7 December 2016 (UTC)--Relisting.RGloucester —
☎17:17, 21 December 2016 (UTC)reply
Support per nomination. If there is any contention that the governments led by Batista and other predecessors of Castro also engaged in propaganda, such properly-sourced supportive detail may likewise become a part of this article.
—Roman Spinner(talk)(contribs)20:26, 21 December 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a
move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Sources
There's something weird with the sources on this article. Outside of 3 books its the same thing source multiple times, claiming its citing a restricted CIA report?
Grassfedbovine (
talk)
22:35, 7 May 2023 (UTC)reply