This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Economics This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. Sociology This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

This article cites only one example of a criticism of the profit motive and a questionable one at that, and yet spends a whole section on counter criticism from multiple publications. If this is to be a debate then you need equal time from both sides and the ability to respond to specific criticisms of your argument, not a single straw man. If this is an explanatory article then I think that the counter criticism section should be folded into the main article or relabeled something like "proponents" and rewrite it as people arguing for the profit motive rather than pretending that they're arguing against Michael Moore. Maybe put some actual critical theory into the criticism section, like say Marx, it's embarrassing! 194.223.72.57 ( talk) 11:10, 23 May 2022 (UTC) reply