![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 |
If 76 of 192 countries have recognized this illegal separation, why you respect the minority, big minority (look the population of Russia, India, China, Brazil, Indonesia, Iran and other big states which do not recognize this illegal act)? Here you must put map of Serbia and under ref you can mention that USA pushed separation. Also you must mention that in 1999. in Pristina lived 40 000 of Serbs and tday just 44. Write a bit about ethnical cleansing of Serbs. Don't close your eyes. Today Kosovo tomorrow Quebec, New Mexico, Texas, Basqia, Wales, North Ireland, Bavaria, Kurdistan and who knows what else. Be fair! Respect laws, international laws, UN Chapter and majority! 79.175.69.103 ( talk) 03:45, 12 June 2011 (UTC)
Well this person clearly seems to have a very narrow minded Serbian point of view. I think its time that Serbia lets go, and let the Serbian minority in Kosovo agree and the new reality. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.217.14.14 ( talk) 08:09, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
WHAT? This was a direct attack ON Serbia! Just let this go??? Yes crimes were committed by BOTH sides, well ALL sides in reality but the one the USA is fed daily is Sbrenica which the USA set up! Why are you not angry about any of this? Yugoslavia was crushed as a whole! The Serbs were the ones blamed for it and your telling them to just let it go? This article is completely biased as with all western propaganda. There is a growing education about this war and we here the USA can not believe this happened. Do your research, read the documents before and during and look where the weapons and funding came from! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.251.116.164 ( talk) 05:01, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
Indepence in each case - yet this seems even more narrow-minded to me. As mentioned, the majority of the UN member states have not recognized Kosovo's independence. I think the current introduction "Pristina is the capital and largest city of Kosovo" fits the actual situation quite good, because it can both be understood as the captial of independent Kosovo or the capital of the Serbian province. -- Maturion ( talk) 19:35, 17 September 2012 (UTC)
I believe the time is now, as good as anytime till now, to edit the entire article and to align it with the reality, viewed both from historical point and from the present perspective. Kosovo has just passed another important test in the eyes of its citizens and also the entire international community : we just had the Local elections nad they were a great success again ! There was an increase on participation in regard from 2007 elections (~ 100,000 plus voters), they where in accordance to European Standards for Elections ( many praises are directed to all Kosovo, it's government and people, for excellent completion of election process so far, from Washington, London and from the EU delegation which was monitoring the process) and what is very important a significant number or serbophone kosovars voted last Sunday for their representatives. Bearing in mind all above and the fact that Kosovo has declared it's independence once and for all from Serbia and from any other administration which is not elected or welcomed by its people, I think the administrator should review the text about Prishtina and make the changes accordingly.
In hope the above arguments and the reality on field will be taken in consideration, I thank anyone who contributed on this subject with their objective argumentations.
Sincerely,
Blerim, (Prishtina born citizen and still living there) Tuesday, November 17, 2009
—Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.149.99.34 ( talk) 19:25, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
Hi, I wanted to incporate some information into the economy section, however it seems you cannot edit it. In 1981 Kosovo's GDP per capita was 33% of the Yugoslav average, while Pristina's GDP per capita was 70% of the Yugoslav average. I think it points out the massive differences in development between Kosovo and the rest of Yugoslavia, but also within Kosovo, since Pristina as a city was much more developed than the rest of Kosovo. Any objections to including this? here's the source [1]
—Preceding unsigned comment added by Yugo91aesop ( talk • contribs) 04:07, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
Is Prishtina really situated in the district of Prizren as indicated in the info box?? -- 93.130.217.174 ( talk) 09:17, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
When I read "An Albanian millionaire in Croatia is building the largest building in the Balkans. Up to 262 metres (860 ft) high and with a capacity to hold 20,000 people it is indeed a jewel.", all I can think is... this reads like an advertisement. -- oKtosiTe talk 10:38, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
There is an edit war in Tafa Air. Since the info box of this article says Pristina is in Kosovo I had changed it in the Tafa Air article once. This has been reverted. Another user always changes it to Kosova and another one back to Serbia. I don't know what's right so please help me. Thanks in advance. -- Albspotter ( talk) 09:09, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
Absolutely disagree with the suggestion/course of action by user Kedadi. We should leave that little disclaimer for the Kosovo page (and its there already, starting with the very first sentence). This is a simple list of destinations served by a fledgling little airline. Let’s leave the politics and protests out of it. Once the status of Kosovo is settled, it’s an easy enough fix to make the change across Wikipedia articles. Until then, leave the status quo. Which is more accurate anyway, because Pristina is in Kosovo, which, in turn, remains in Serbia. Jasepl ( talk) 16:32, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
Please, do not change facts! You are not Security Council of the UN to establish new states!!!!!!!! Pristina is city in Serbia and not capital of some selfproclaimed state of Kosovo which is not recognized by 2/3 of countries and 80% of world's population. Wikipedia can not put FAKE facts!!!!!!!!!!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.87.199.15 ( talk) 22:07, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
Wikipedia has to be neutral. You must mention that it is a part of Serbia for Serbia and 2/3 of world's state, while for Albanian separatists and 1/3 of countries (like "free" Afghanistan and some else) is a "state"... so Pristina is not a capital of some selfproclaimed Kosovo but the largest city of Serbian province of Kosovo and Metohija, at least by UN ! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.87.216.248 ( talk) 15:57, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
Pristina is part of Kosovo, the new state! :) So stop bitching about it man. Its over, get on with your life...its what most of the people want in Kosovo and this affects you none. So move on, and maybe focuse more on doing your homework rather then talk nonsense
Someone doesn't know how to put in an endnote tag lol.... 99.236.221.124 ( talk) 01:18, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
…since by its current external borders it implies that Kosovo is still part of Serbia, a status that is not recognized internationally. To be NPOV, the map should show only the borders of Kosovo itself.-- MaGioZal ( talk) 15:18, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
{{editsemiprotected}} Name of city is : Prishtina (Kosova) Prishtina is the capital and the largest city of Kosovo, it and its suburbs are estimated to have a total population of over 500,000. It is unclear how many inhabitants the city has, as the population has for decades boycotted the censuses organized in former Yugoslavia.
The area of Prishtina has a long history, in its vincity archaeological discoveries have been found which date back to the early neolithical ages.
Southeast of the city, the remains of Ulpiana were discovered, the center of the Illyrian province of Dardania. Ulpiana dates back to pre Roman times, during Roman rule Ulpiana flourished it was renewed in the 6th century during the rule of Justinian, after whom it was called Iustinana Secunda. According to inscriptions on the monuments from Ulpiana, it is apparent that it was one of the most beautiful cities of the Illyrian Dardania, as it was often reffered to as Ulpiana Splendissima. A number of articles were discovered here such as coins, ceramics, weapons, jewlery, all of which are exhibited at the Museum of History of Kosovo in Prishtina.
Thekanun1 ( talk) 00:00, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
Can we please edit this Article to make it look similar to those of other capital cities.
this would make the whole page seem more pleasant and it would put Prishtina/Pristina in line with other capitals cities from around the world.
Please take this into consideration when making new edits on the page.
Thankyou. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.218.24.78 ( talk) 13:28, 11 August 2010 (UTC)
Personally I don't support Kosovan independence but I don't believe that much can be done about that now. Anyway, this article should be titled "Prishtinë or Prishtina" which are the common Albanian spellings of the city. I know this is English Wikipedia but that isn't the point - spellings of major cities where there are ethnic problems should use the spelling of the majority of people in that city. English spellings will change overtime in the same way that Bombay (Mumbai), Peking (Beijing), Stettin (Szczecin), Breslau (Wroclaw), Constantinople (Istanbul), Fiume (Rijeka), Zara (Zadar) and all the others that have changed their spelling in English to reflect the wishes of the people in that area.-- 78.155.48.36 ( talk) 21:35, 12 December 2010 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
I think that it is not logical to put on a name of a city as it is called by its enemies, rather than the way it is called by its inhabitants, and is recognized internationally. It is as if writing New York City in Cyrillic and claiming that that is the norm. In the name of objective truth I would like to change some of the entries in the name of Prishtina, the capitol of Kosova, and that the name Pristina be redirected to Prishtina instead. If truth is what you want, truth is what you will get, in this objective website. Please let me be objective.
Atdheu ( talk) 06:58, 10 April 2011 (UTC)
This small part is based upon 3 sources,2 of which are based in Vienna and Budapest,main cities of Austro-Hungarian Empire.In those times,Austro-Hungarian Empire had very clear anti Serbian attitude so these sources could,very well be pure propaganda against Serbia,in context of hostility which will result in World War I.
3rd sourcе (Archbishop of Skopje),used to source 2 claims:
says folowing regarding Pristina:
Whole part of article lacks of (neutral) sources and is (deliberately) misusing other sources.
CrniBombarder!!!
(†)
17:11, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
I agree that the big majority of the slavic cities, towns, place, rivers, mountains around Europe have names that are originary slavic. But you just can't write that it is wrong that Pristina is not a Serbian name. It is. Almost every geographical name in Serbia is of serbian-slavic origin. Like in Poland the names are of polish-slavic origin. Please correct the mistake. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vukajlija54 ( talk • contribs) 09:15, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
The origin of the Prishtina name is undocumented and hardly can be taken as a given fact that it has a Slavic origin. I'm not disputing any claim on Prishtina's name but why not taking into consideration other possibilities like Dardan origin or the latin words such as: pristina, pristinum ...what can be more obvious, why searching for more complicated answers when simpler ones are pretty explanatory, satisfactory and very often correct ones.
Blerim, (Prishtina born citizen and still living there) Sunday, July 15, 2012
![]() |
An image used in this article,
File:Collage of views of Pristina.png, has been nominated for deletion at
Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Media without a source as of 17 September 2011
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
This notification is provided by a Bot -- CommonsNotificationBot ( talk) 19:01, 17 September 2011 (UTC) |
![]() |
An image used in this article,
File:Views over Pristina.png, has been nominated for speedy deletion at
Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
This notification is provided by a Bot -- CommonsNotificationBot ( talk) 09:01, 8 October 2011 (UTC) |
![]() |
An image used in this article,
File:Prishtina-Kosovo.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at
Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Media without a source as of 8 October 2011
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
This notification is provided by a Bot -- CommonsNotificationBot ( talk) 09:02, 8 October 2011 (UTC) |
I noticed that there are only universities listed on the EDUCATION heading. Would it be possible to add a list of International Schools?
I submitted an article on International Learning Group which is an non-profit English language elementary school in Pristina.
Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Johnsone330 ( talk • contribs) 17:24, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please correct the typo:
"put thw population" to "put the population".
161.5.0.200 ( talk) 12:30, 18 April 2012 (UTC)
Could someone fix "New Born" to "Newborn", as per the monument? "New Born" doesn't even make sense in English. 60.242.48.18 ( talk) 17:48, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Begkeka ( talk) 05:27, 3 December 2012 (UTC) Please add the external link to http://www.ecivirtual.com/ because it gives a panoramic view of Prishtina and other landmarks in Kosova. All I have done is to add the link to the External Links section. I believe this will enrich the user experience by providing a unique view of Prishtina as well as its tourist attractions. Thank you!
Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Kosovo-related articles/Prishtina-Pristina-Priština ... the actual link is broken, redlinked in the 5 May 2008 edit summary. A look at English print sources in Google Books 2012-2013 shows Prishtina with 1,500 results Pristina/Priština with 2,500 results of which 90% are non-enabled for haceks, 10% are enabled for haceks. No English source which can use š deliberately omits it as we are deliberately doing. In ictu oculi ( talk) 04:49, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
Since according to international law Kosovo is part of Serbia, the UN officially doesn't accept its unilateral deceleration of independence, and as this is disputable area, the UN is known to be reliable guide, I propose changing map from so-called Republic of Kosovo to Serbia map. Comments are appreciated. Alex discussion ★ 14:48, 10 November 2013 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
On page "Pristina", final paragraph under heading "Pristina in the Kosovo War and afterwards", "oth" should be deleted, so that sentence reads, "...reconstruction funds from donors..." 155.245.50.114 ( talk) 09:40, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
I think that label Univerity of Pristina should lead reader to Wikipedia page under this title: University of Pristina and not on article Universiteti i Prishtinës or that label in introductory section should be Universiteti i Prishtinës, not University of Pristina since per Wikipedia there is dispute over the usage of that label between Universiteti i Prishtinës and Univerzitet u Prištini from North Kosovska Mitrovica. I prefere label Universiteti i Prishtinës but you can see which option is better. The current approach looks somewhat biased although I can understand used logic-merge article with institution actually located in city. But this deliberately ignore name dispute and prescribe solution what is not acceptable per Wikipedia standards. All the best.-- MirkoS18 ( talk) 21:58, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
I don't have the time or knowledge to look into whether they're all notable or needed, but someone knowledgeable of this article should be able to. I believe they've been written as part of Wiki Academy Kosovo. If they are notable they should warrant links from this article too;
Samwalton9 ( talk) 16:18, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
Why is missing the emblem of Prishtina in the article. The emblem is present in the official web-site of Municipality of Prishtina. [1] -- Ammar Tivari Talk! 18:52, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request to
Pristina has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
The name of the capital city Prishtina is written mistakenly. Namely, it should be Prishtina and not Pristina, Kosova and not Kosovo and so forth! Also, most of the toponyms of Kosova in use by Wikipedia are of serbian language, and this in not correct. If you still insist in using Serbian toponyms, you should first use those in Albanian language followed by those in Serbian language. Such as the case is with Fushë Kosovë/Kosovo Polje, Ferizaj/Urosevac, Pejë/Pec and many others.
46.99.0.233 ( talk) 19:02, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
Not done We are not using Serbian, or Albanian, we are using English. This is the English Wikipedia and we always use the most common spelling in English as
Wikipedia:Naming conventions (use English) =
Arjayay (
talk)
19:12, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
Hey guys! I don't understand why the Turkish translation of the city is added in the official name. There is not a significant percentage of the Turkish population in the city, nor the language spoken. If there is source that Turkish is also an official language of Prishtina, then please send it to me! I feel it's useless to add the Turkish name to the official name of the city.
![]() | This
edit request to
Pristina has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please add new link to free online travel guide to Pristina
Travelstig ( talk) 21:08, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
A disruptive editor has been causing some problems. LeoC12 has twice now without consensus changed the subdivision name in the infobox from Kosovo (with status note) to Serbia. This user has also changed the opening sentence "capital and largest city of Kosovo. (with status note)" to "capital and largest city of the Autonomous Province of Kosovo and Metohija". I have a a few issues with this:
Regards IJA ( talk) 18:37, 29 December 2014 (UTC)
The current estimate of the area (854 sq km) seems to be incorrect, mainly due to the formation of new municipalities that were formerly part of Prishtina. A 2014 report published by the OSCE mission shows the total area of Pristina at 572 sq km.-- PjeterPeter ( talk) 01:21, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: not moved. ErikHaugen ( talk | contribs) 19:31, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Pristina → Prishtina – The names "Pristina" and "Prishtina" are both common enough for the city (Google Books e.g. gives 474,000 results for "Pristina" and 295,00 for "Prishtina"), however, we should consider the accuracy of each. In each of the spoken languages in the region (Serbian, Albanian, and Turkish), the name is pronounced in the same way: /Prishtina/ (except that Serbian and Turkish use "š" and "ş", respectively, for "sh"). A more accurate English language transliteration, for each of the three aforementioned languages, is "Prishtina". This makes "Pristina" relatively inaccurate as compared to "Prishtina". Also, "Prishtina" has the advantage for being the official name of the city in English language Kosovo government websites like [2]. WP:COMMONNAME: "...inaccurate names for the article subject, as determined in reliable sources, are often avoided even though they may be more frequently used by reliable sources". I would like if we use this quoted policy, and prefer the more accurate name, which is also common enough. Thanks. Khestwol ( talk) 16:54, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Why not show the logo of Pristina like other capitals do
http://www.brandsoftheworld.com/sites/default/files/styles/logo-thumbnail/public/0019/6385/brand.gif — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.175.70.28 ( talk) 12:07, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
Please unlock or correct basic errors. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 182.249.244.32 ( talk) 00:06, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request to
Pristina has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Hello, there is a problem with the website link for the "Municipality of Prishtina" on the bottom of the right hand grey column at the starting page. The current website on wikipedia seems to be a japanese sex website for some obscure reason. I propose the edit of inserting the following correct website link: https://kk.rks-gov.net/prishtina/
Faleminderit/Thank You
SmackShark ( talk) 22:47, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Pristina. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 18:53, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
As a born Prishtinali (you may see my earlier comment on elections as Blerim, Prishtina born citizen and still living there) I was compelled to open this new section in order to comment and hopefully to provide additional and improved information on following calim/info: "Lately a new green place called Tauk Bashqe has been made half way between Gërmia and City Park"
This gives impression that Taukbashçe (probably originating from Turkish Tavuk Bahçe: Chicken Garden)is a park established, as mentioned 'lately', after the war. This is a misleading fact although I would like to believe it was more likely disarranged than 'served' as such on purpose for malinformation.
To cut the long story short Taukbashçe is a very old city park which borders with Velania, Taslixhe, Vellusha neighborhoods and stretches almost to New Sefajlia neighborhood. It probably predates 20th century. I have no proof to support this claim, but I know it was a park long before I was born in 1969 where as a kid I spent a lot of time playing in and around it, and it was frequently mentioned by my parents and elderly people born in Prishtina in 1920's and 1930's as a place where citizens went for recreation. It had a very popular Tavern, which nowadays after the war was refurbished and renovated.
Taukbashçe is the largest of three main city parks, other two being The City Park and Varrezat Përkujtimore (nowadays refered to as: Varrezat e Dëshmorëve - Martyr's Cemetery).
Blerim, Prishtina born citizen and still living there
Prishtina is a major communications centre of media in Kosovo. Almost all of the major media organizations in the Kosovo are based in Prishtina.
Media in Prishtina has its beginnings on 26 November 1975, Prishtina Radio Television or RTP (Albanian: Radio Televizioni i Prishtinës, Serbian: Радио-телевизија Приштина, Radio-televizija Priština) was the first Albanian television channel in Kosovo, and it was part of JRT and had its building in Kosovo's capital Pristina (then a Yugoslav Autonomous Province). Both radio and television transmitted in Albanian, Serbian and Turkish language. Television discontinued transmission on 10 June 1999 and was relocated to Central Serbia, later it was dissolved.After the Kosovo war material and buildings of Radio Television Pristina are under the administration of Radio Television of Kosovo.
Radio Pristina started transmission immediately after the World War II in Prizren 1945 (later to be transferred to Pristina) and it was founded by Parlament of Kosovo province
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on Pristina. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 15:22, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Pristina. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.balkanweb.com/kultur%EB/2691/idhulli-i-dardanise-apo-hyjnesha-ne-fron-56278.htmlWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 04:15, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
It says Pristina was part of the vilna culture. Is this true? Is this accepted science? Leendert123 ( talk) 23:23, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Can someone please change the city seal, as it has been updated
you can confirm this on the official government site here https://kk.rks-gov.net/prishtina/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.0.214.108 ( talk) 12:21, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
{{geodata-check}}
The following coordinate fixes are needed for
— Beratademajj1997 ( talk) 20:57, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether Portal:Pristina is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The page will be discussed at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Pristina until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the page during the discussion, including to improve the page to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the deletion notice from the top of the page.-- Happypillsjr ✉ 13:08, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request to
Pristina has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
File:Tempulli Ortodoks në Prishtinë.jpg Arson08 ( talk) 22:18, 28 May 2020 (UTC)