This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bangladesh, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Bangladesh on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BangladeshWikipedia:WikiProject BangladeshTemplate:WikiProject BangladeshBangladesh articles
This article is within the scope of
WikiProject Bangladeshi Universities, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Bangladeshi UniversitiesWikipedia:WikiProject Bangladeshi UniversitiesTemplate:WikiProject Bangladeshi UniversitiesBangladeshi Universities articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Higher education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
higher education,
universities, and
colleges on Wikipedia. Please visit the project page to join the
discussion, and see the project's
article guideline for useful advice.Higher educationWikipedia:WikiProject Higher educationTemplate:WikiProject Higher educationHigher education articles
Dispute
The article contains a lot of unlikely information, which is difficult to verify. It needs additional references for its verification. The reference section need to be improved.
Aditya(
talk •
contribs)17:00, 3 February 2008 (UTC)reply
Which information is unlikely and cannot be verified? Unless there is a contrary opinion against a specific information on the article, there is no dispute. Arman(
Talk)01:54, 4 February 2008 (UTC)reply
Removed stale POV tag with no active discussion per Template:POV
An old neutrality tag that appears to have no active discussion has been removed from this page per the instructions at
Template:POV:
This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever any one of the following is true:
There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant
The article still has serious problems, such as depending on a single, non-independent source, but it has been edited considerably since it was tagged 2-3 years ago, and there has been no discussion of neutrality, so I've removed the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one!
Worldbruce (
talk)
01:18, 1 October 2015 (UTC)reply