This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Prashna Upanishad article. This is
not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hinduism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Hinduism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HinduismWikipedia:WikiProject HinduismTemplate:WikiProject HinduismHinduism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of
India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to
philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles
@
Ms Sarah Welch: : Everything shared is wrong. Moreover the sanskrit translation is wrong, i have read them a long back, taught me by a guru plus i am from country who's heritage is you talking about, so from my knowledge the corrections i made was legit, western-scholars mis-understood everything, this wrong info guides countless of people to opposite direction. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Deadshot888 (
talk •
contribs)
19:57, 17 February 2016 (UTC)reply
@
Ms Sarah Welch:: since not my blog so you decide to spread wrong stuff related to my own heritage to my own people ? lol ? ATLEAST correct the sanskrit translations the stuff is wrong, look at the language they use, "belief" , "embellished". it is false. Everything shared over there is "misunderstood" form of my own people's study. oh yea on the blog i thought wikipedia is platform for all ? no ? alright but for good's sake, at-least research on what is written oh wait how can you research, you guys believe in western-scholars, not being offensive but the stuff they share is wrong, i don't know it is "on-purpose" or they are really stupid. :) Take care. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Deadshot888 (
talk •
contribs)