This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
I find the description a bit misleading. Looking at the sources provided, there seems to be only a speculation from 1949 that it might be Roman fort. The archeological examination from 1994/1995 doesn't even mention the word "Roman" and seems to consider it a Pictish site instead. Also note the given radiocarbon dating seem to exclude a Roman construction as afaik the Romans did not venture that far north after Agricola's campaign (80-84).-- Kmhkmh ( talk) 11:38, 31 August 2014 (UTC)
The fort -according to official RCAHMS- has been probably defaced in 1872 ( http://canmore.rcahms.gov.uk/en/site/15629/details/port+a+chaistell/ ). Please, do not remove the official data/reference of RCAHMS from the article, since there is NO proof that the fort did not existed.....BD — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.134.158.111 ( talk) 15:04, 28 November 2014 (UTC)