This redirect is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a
list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the
full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
Then, I guess, we need to change article's name, because I have no seen any information proving that Bataillon "Ostland" was called Polizei-Bataillon 33 for a while. (It seems to be actually taken from some
Soviet historiography books, as here are many unproven facts labeling the battalion.)
DJ Sturm (
talk)
08:56, 17 August 2009 (UTC)reply
What proves that link is reliable source? Here:
[2] and in the book "Estonian freedomfighters in World War Two/Eesti vabadusvõitlejad Teises maailmasõjas" the number 33 is not mentioned.
DJ Sturm (
talk)
09:37, 17 August 2009 (UTC)reply
The article has nothing to do with the Estonian Schuma. It is supposed to be about the German Orpo battalion (Reserve-)Polizei-Battalion "Ostland" later known as (Reserve-)Polizei-Battalion 33. It was a German Orpo battalion raised in mid-1941 from Baltic Umsiedler, i.e. Baltic Germans, Estonians, and Latvians from the resettlement camps in the Warthegau. See Estonia 1940–1945, pp. 827–8 for the basic facts from a scholarly source. —
Zalktis (
talk)
11:01, 17 August 2009 (UTC)reply
Unproven claims
Why the article says what happened at Minsk, if the battalion "Ostland" was never in Minsk? And why the information about battalion's size, disbanding, etc. was deleted? What's the reason of talking about unproven Soviet claims about killing of civilians as facts?
DJ Sturm (
talk)
11:49, 18 August 2009 (UTC)reply
You mean that
[3] and
[4] are not the same unit? However, both were formed in the same place at the same time and all Estonian sources talk about only one battalion "Ostland".
DJ Sturm (
talk)
12:32, 18 August 2009 (UTC)reply
NYP source?
According to, amongst others, Amazon, Massimo Aricco's book on the Orpo battalions (
ISBN9789185657988) is not yet published (currently expected May 2010). How can it be cited here as a reliable source, then? —
Zalktis (
talk)
11:25, 29 December 2009 (UTC)reply
The article was created by a sock of
Bloomfield (
talk·contribs),
Briephsmile (
talk·contribs). The original version created by this hoax- and sockmaster was quite different (
[5]) and citing looked very solid at a glance, as usual with his articles. It was obviously cited through
this website and is available according to them, too - published 15 September 2009. See also
[6].
Same as with all Bloomfield creations, everything should be double- and triple-checked. Same as other clever hoax-masters, he creates an article with a grain of truth - and then twists everything, creating a complete hoax.