This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Politics of Bihar article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is written in Indian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, analysed, defence) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
bihar may have deteriorated uder lalu prasad yadav but of late there have been winds of change.i guess u need to go to patna to see this.rather,feel this. 12:28, 7 February 2008 User:59.95.75.213
The result of the move request was: page moved, with histmerge. Anthony Appleyard ( talk) 05:30, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
Bihar's Politics → Politics of Bihar move together with a history merge
Transferring a nom from AFD, with the original rationale copied below. For my part, I note that a speedy tag would be declined for any redirect with a non-trivial history, which this one certainly has. No particular opinion on deletion. UltraExactZZ Said ~ Did 20:18, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
Original Rationale from Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Politics of Bihar follows:
had speedy-tagged this redirect, as Politics of Bihar is the proper naming for the article per WPMOS, now at the incorrectly and badly named Bihar's Politics. Speedy was declined because "redirect has a long history", which is meaningless if the article needs to be occupying that space. Chris (クリス • フィッチュ) ( talk) 14:37, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
![]() |
An image used in this article,
File:Loknayak.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at
Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
This notification is provided by a Bot -- CommonsNotificationBot ( talk) 10:14, 4 September 2011 (UTC) |
I am quite surprised by the tone that has been used in the article. This article takes side which should not happen on Wikipedia. Only the facts should be given and people should be allowed to make their own views. For example, in the section -"Bihar movement & Aftermath: 1975-1990", the authors writes that " Bihar got an anti-establishment image." Such a comment is completely a thought that many people may hold but is still not a fact. Hence, should not be here. Furthermore there has been no citation for it. The article might be needed to be completely rewritten.
Ankit Saini 14:53, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
Hi @ Sitush: i have reverted this article to last best version edited by you as the latest edits were disruptive.But still the problem persists as some of the cited source dont work at all.As i know that edits by a sockpuppet should be removed.But , going through edits that the banned user did.....i found some genuine refrences....so can i revert it further back while checking the verifiability of the sources of banned user....as it will make my work easier since writing is an arduous task and i m busy in other articles right now.Recently created two articles too. Heba Aisha ( talk) 11:45, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
Given a final look almost all sources used were not working at all.But now i have added good sources.It needs further expansion which i will do in coming months. Heba Aisha ( talk) 18:08, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
I found many portions of this page to be non-compliant with the Wikipedia guidelines of factual accuracy and non-opiniated content. I have cleaned as much as I could. I have also put the sections of Post 1990 politics in the History section, where it belongs, rather than having it as separate sections. Only the latest updates should be kept as a separate Heading, which is at the bottom. I found the Political violence section to be quite relevant and moved it downwards as a independent section, from a sub-heading.
Overall, this page needs more work on the Post 1990 elections. It has a lot of content that is very opiniated and needs to be cleaned to bring it to the encyclopedic format, from the Opinion Piece it currently reads like.
If you are planning to make changes in the page, kindly consider these factors.
Hparashar1520 ( talk) 15:52, 27 July 2021 (UTC) Harsh
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 13:06, 30 December 2020 (UTC)