Political history of Zimbabwe was one of the History good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the
good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be
renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the role of the
Rhodesian head of government gradually evolved, between 1890 and 1970, from that of a
company-appointed administrator to the prime ministerial office of a republic?
Political history of Zimbabwe is within the scope of WikiProject Zimbabwe, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of
Zimbabwe and
Zimbabwe-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the
project page.ZimbabweWikipedia:WikiProject ZimbabweTemplate:WikiProject ZimbabweZimbabwe articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject British Empire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
British Empire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.British EmpireWikipedia:WikiProject British EmpireTemplate:WikiProject British EmpireBritish Empire articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the
legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA from 2012. I feel as if this article fails the broadness category since this article has not been updated and fails to mention many important events in the country's political history such as the
2017 Zimbabwe Coup amongst others.
Onegreatjoke (
talk)
22:44, 21 June 2023 (UTC)reply
Unfortunately this article has not been updated and it would be a non trivial amount of work in order to bring it up to standard. It is at the edge of my expertise and outside of my time commitments right now and so it would only make sense for it to be reassessed until it can be fixed at a later time.
Jorahm (
talk)
23:11, 30 June 2023 (UTC)reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.