This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Role-playing games Low‑importance This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Role-playing games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of role-playing games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Role-playing gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Role-playing gamesTemplate:WikiProject Role-playing gamesrole-playing game articles Low This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Material from Polaris (2005 role-playing game) was split to Polaris (role-playing game) on 22:34, 24 April 2013‎. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted so long as the latter page exists. Please leave this template in place to link the article histories and preserve this attribution. The former page's talk page can be accessed at Talk:Polaris (2005 role-playing game).

Material from Polaris (1997 role-playing game) was split to Polaris (role-playing game) on 22:34, 24 April 2013‎. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted so long as the latter page exists. Please leave this template in place to link the article histories and preserve this attribution. The former page's talk page can be accessed at Talk:Polaris (1997 role-playing game).

Polaris: Chivalric Tragedy at the Utmost North is the only game on this page I've heard of. It is also available in multiple languages, and sells quite well. If all these games are notable enough to be mentioned, shouldn't they get their own pages? I'd be happy to separate it out, but I didn't want to step on any toes if this article exists this way for a specific reason. 3lizabeth ( talk) 02:15, 2 November 2009 (UTC) reply

42 months later:  Done. jonkerz ♠talk 22:53, 24 April 2013 (UTC) reply

The page now redirects to the disambig page, with this information included there. Can we just delete this page? Leadwind ( talk) 02:39, 6 December 2013 (UTC) reply