This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article contains a translation of Piratenpartei from de.wikipedia. ( 472371511 et seq.) The "History" and "International Organizations" sections have been translated. |
I suggest that we may create one article named "pirate party" that includes the common shared values and history of the movement. -- Englishazadipedia ( talk) 15:36, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
Couldn't that go into the Pirate Party International article? 203.206.24.96 ( talk) 03:58, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
Shouldn't this article have all the pirate party names written in one fashion? Suggestions: "Pirate Party of X" , "Pirate Party (X)", or "X-ian Pirate Party" - (where X is the name of the country) - ArnoldPlaton ( talk) 11:11, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
This whole article is a joke, right? Incomprehensible Google Translate English kind of language with German sounding sentences and really bad if not even wrong information. How can this be online? Take the complete intro, or these two sentences: "Generality, the pirate parties for their commitment to reform copyright law, known among other things, the legalization of file sharing by private copying. The Pirate parties are seen as representatives of the criminal pirates seen." ... Doesn't anyone else feel the deep need to rewrite these? VOoiJe ( talk) 19:43, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
I do, unfortunately the sentences are so malformed I can't decipher their meaning, let alone rewrite them with better wording. Does anyone know what the original source is?
Also referring to "pirate" as a 'reappropriation' of the term by media companies is not correct, it is a 'misappropriation'. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Billse10 ( talk • contribs) 17:38, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
Who else thinks that the grammar in this post is atrocious? I would do a complete rewrite and cleanup, but I don't have the time or the motivation. Anyone wanna take it on? haha 208.102.9.17 ( talk) 02:06, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
In the section "Pirate Parties in national elections" Sweden is listed 2 times please review
Dates in the table "Pirate Parties in EU Election 2009" are clearly wrong. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.210.219.132 ( talk) 22:54, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
the german pirate parties is starting to look a bit messy, with all the different rows. anyway to make this more concise or re-arrange ? -- Richhaddon ( talk) 14:40, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
The article claims that Pirate Parties support "free education, universal healthcare and a clear separation between church and state". This statement is not founded. Some Pirate Parties might indeed support these ideas formally, but this is by no means unanimous. For example, the "separation between church and state" is something that very few parties formally support. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.65.246.59 ( talk) 15:34, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
The article also claims that the parties support direct democracy as a matter of course. They don't. Some do, some do only for internal decision making and some don't at all. Piratenfiber ( talk) 20:46, 3 August 2013 (UTC)
Piraten Partei Tirol is not a state party of Piratenpartei Österreich, it split from the national party in 2011. It seems that the city councillor who was elected as a PPT member left them and is now presenting himself as chairman of "Inn Piraten" (named after the river that flows through the state). Choehek ( talk)
It seems judging by this facebook page there is an unregistered but active party in South Africa: https://www.facebook.com/PiratePartySouthAfrica?ref=ts&fref=ts
Should it be added to the list? -- Darthdyas ( talk) 21:16, 13 April 2013 (UTC)
The Pirate Party of Iceland currently has six representatives in parliament and previously had 10. Given this success, is it maybe time to stop listing every elected representative? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.220.125.157 ( talk) 19:16, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
The concept of a green party and the ideology of green politics have separate articles. Should the same be done for the concept of a pirate party and the ideology of pirate politics (right now pirate politics redirects to pirate party)? HapHaxion ( talk / contribs) 03:12, 27 December 2019 (UTC)
I am not sure if all Pirate Parties are inherently social liberal. There are too different alignments changing for the party. For example some members of Pirate Party of Turkey including one leader currently do entryism in Workers' Party of Turkey, a Marxist-Leninist political party. Also Pirate Party of Catalonia is led by an anarcho-communist. -- Comrade-yutyo ( talk) 11:52, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
Can someone please help change Australia to Aqua or whatever shade is being used for "Unregistered but active"? They have voluntarily deregistered from local elections. -- Tytrox ( talk) 07:41, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
"Some campaigns have included demands for the reform of copyright and patent laws." I honestly can't tell from this whether they're campaigning for a relaxation of restrictions on copying or for stronger restrictions. I can probably guess from the use of the word "pirate", but it would be good to have a bit more detail on the page. Jowa fan ( talk) 09:56, 20 May 2022 (UTC)