This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Tambayan Philippines Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tambayan Philippines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related to the Philippines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Tambayan PhilippinesWikipedia:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesTemplate:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesPhilippine-related articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale. Scouting Low‑importance Philippine Islands Council (Boy Scouts of America) is part of the Scouting WikiProject, an effort to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Scouting and Guiding on the Wikipedia. This includes but is not limited to boy and girl organizations, WAGGGS and WOSM organizations as well as those not so affiliated, country and region-specific topics, and anything else related to Scouting. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ScoutingWikipedia:WikiProject ScoutingTemplate:WikiProject ScoutingScouting articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

I moved this article back to Philippine Islands Council (Boy Scouts of America), which meets Scouting WPMOS naming conventions. This is part of the problem with your articles, you are not listening to anyone.-- Kintetsubuffalo ( talk) 10:48, 27 October 2016 (UTC) reply

• This article is really a mess. The first thing I would do to fix it is convert the tables into prose. -- evrik ^{( talk)} 14:53, 27 October 2016 (UTC) reply

• @ Oliver Puertogallera:, Kintetsubuffalo is applying the correct standard to the name of the article and it should not be moved again. Per Wikipedia Manual of Style and prose, this article is entirely non-conforming. It has far too long and extensive quotes as well. See too many quotes. It needs cleanup and a rewrite right away. — btphelps ^{( talk to me) ( what I've done)} 16:47, 28 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Can't write, can't edit, struts around the virtual world of Wikipedia to cover up deep-seated insecurities. Oliver Puertogallera ( talk) 22:32, 20 January 2017 (UTC) reply

Nobody is trying to make you feel bad, stupid or useless. We've all been saying all along that your information and your participation are valuable, but that Wikipedia has standards and guidelines that should be followed. We have each proposed remedies to make your useful work encyclopedic, and during the AfD we were imploring you to come to the discussion and join in. I've seen the list-of-people-who've-wronged on your userpage. No one is out to get you.-- Kintetsubuffalo ( talk) 03:13, 21 January 2017 (UTC) reply