"Paris haute couture shows" what are these? Is there a link? Do they have a name?
Done - added WP link
Could link "fascinator".
Done
"wearing his own creation" surely "one of his own creations"?
Done
Is his preferred "hat-designer" hyphenated (per lead) or not (per infobox)?
Done, no hyphen needed
No need to link "wedding".
Done
Isn't Catholic capitalised?
Done
"a 6-week" six-week.
Done
1987 graduation from NCAD isn't mentioned in the prose.
Done
"Treacy designed" I think it would read better with "had" in there.
Done
"record attendance" record for what?
Done, took this out, the source calls it "record", but does not clarify what it means.
"Blow. [..] " check
MOS:ELLIPSIS and
MOS:QUOTE 'cos that don't look quite right to me?
Done, replaced with ...
"In 1991, Treacy, aged.... " this sentence has too many run-ons for me.
Done - re-structured this sentence
Not sure why so much reasonable and relevant detail has been confined to footnotes?
Done, agree on reflection - have added all of g and some of b into the article.
"his first of five" -> "the first of his five"?
Done
"In 1993, Treacy" quick repeat style, why not "Two years later, he ..."?
Done
"Treacy designed the Beauxbatons hats for Harry Potter in 2005" this is a sentence so takes a full stop, and do you really mean to link to the franchise rather than the movie series, or better still, the actual movie?
Done
Harvey Nicks doesn't need italics.
Done
Le Bon, not le Bon.
Done
"which were all " => "all of which were"
Done
"right beside Isabella " -> "next door to..."?
Done
McQueen is overlinked.
Done
" Givenchy Haute Couture " if this is one thing, don't double link it. If this isn't one thing, haute couture isn't capitalised.
Done, no need for haute couture here
Lagerfeld and Chanel overlinked.
Done
"Rifat Ozbek " our article has no diacritic.
Done
"of haute couture," now in small, and italics. Overlnked.
Done, re-worked sentence
"ncluding Harry Potter" should be something like "including the Harry Potter film series".
Done
The Goblet of Fire should be italics.
Done
And for its proper title, it ought to be spelt out: Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire.
"Treacy had previously written a piece for The Guardian" any reason this is in the Wider fashion section?
Question: I wondered what to do with this as I didn't have a natural section for it – I felt "wider fashion" was the least-worst, and comes deeper into the article when it is more interesting to have him reflect on his work? I don't have a conviction on this either way?