This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Why is the opinion of Mr. Arnold Heertje included? He is not involved and he has an opinion about everything. I think his opinion does not carry enough weight to be included. Andries ( talk) 07:32, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
It's true, it happened, it's all over the papers in The Netherlands. Quite serious scientists and media support the allegations, some even speaking of "factfree science". But that does not mean it should be in Wikipedia - to this extent. It unbalances the article and the reflist. It should be worded with more caution and restraint. Regards, Sander1453 ( talk) 13:50, 26 June 2014 (UTC)
While I agree that the section on allegiations unbalances the article, I don't believe the section should be reworded. Instead, the allegiations might be balanced by a section on Nijkamps contributions to economics. Currently, the article mirrors the not uncommon belief that Nijkamp values quantity of quality. In half a year, no one has found the need to rebalance this article, which suggests there is no dispute at all. Eezacque ( talk) 13:11, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Peter Nijkamp. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 04:13, 24 January 2018 (UTC)