GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer:
Seabuckthorn (
talk ·
contribs)
16:57, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Nominator:
Erick (
talk) and
HĐ (
talk ·
contribs)
Hi! My review for this article will be here shortly. -- Seabuckthorn ♥ 16:57, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
1: Well-written
Check for WP:LEAD:
|
Done
Check for WP:LAYOUT: Done
|
Done
Check for WP:WTW: Done
Check for WP:MOSFICT: Done
|
Done
|
2: Verifiable with no original research
Done
Check for WP:RS: Done
|
Done
Check for inline citations WP:MINREF: Done
|
Done
|
3: Broad in its coverage
a.
Major aspects:
|
---|
Done
|
b.
Focused:
|
---|
Done
|
4: Neutral
Done
4. Fair representation without bias: Done
|
5: Stable: No
edit wars, etc: Yes
6: Images Done (NFC with a valid FUR)
Images:
|
---|
Done
6: Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content: Done
6: Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions: Done
|
I'm glad to see your work here. I do have some insights based on the above checklist that I think will improve the article:
Besides that, I think the article looks excellent. You've done great work, and I am quite happy to assist you in improving it. All the best, -- Seabuckthorn ♥ 11:06, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
Promoting the article to GA status. -- Seabuckthorn ♥ 01:21, 5 February 2014 (UTC)