This article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to
join the project and contribute to the
discussion. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the
documentation.KoreaWikipedia:WikiProject KoreaTemplate:WikiProject KoreaKorea-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about
television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can
join the discussion.
To improve this article, please refer to the
style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
internet culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Internet cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Internet cultureTemplate:WikiProject Internet cultureInternet culture articles
Hello, I have a few things in mind that I want to impart to my fellow Wikipedians who are actively working on this page. I thought this route is better so that people know where I am coming from, when I edit, and avoid
WP:EW.
I firmly believe that the Production section should come after the Lead section, as it provides some background information on the series, similar to
Big Brother 11 (American season), which is currently considered a
WP:GA. At least for now, until we further expand the page.
The Broadcast section could be added under the Production section as a subsection. Another thing, as per
WP:NOTTVGUIDE, I don't think we should mention the time slot, unless it's notable or highly significant.
I am unsure about the 1-member Team subsection. I guess, what bothers me about it is that it's presented as a table. I think it's better if it's written out as a paragraph instead. The position column I think is unnecessary.
Oh wow. I was just thinking that if ever there's a controversy, it should be placed under Reception. So, yes please do so. And maybe under a controversy subsection? — Eugh jei♥Kaorin13:46, 6 March 2023 (UTC)reply
Now that this is concluded with the person involved leaving the show (
here), I am still reluctant to write a whole section about this in this article. I feel that a sentence or two, or maybe even a paragraph, under Contestants would suffice. It's a Kim Hyun-jae controversy and not a Peak Time controversy, if that makes any sense. Just wondering what my fellow editors think about this. — Eugh jei♥Kaorin10:19, 13 March 2023 (UTC)reply
I would also lean towards not including it as the majority of groups listed there already have a Wikipedia article with their debut year anyway. As for the rest, the debut year is listed in the table right underneath, which is easier to read than cluttering the "contestants" section with the dates.
RueNightshade (
talk)
00:41, 19 March 2023 (UTC)reply
Thanks for the input. For clarification, I was referring to the debut year info written in the narrative and in the table. I am for removal of it completely. Though I do see why one would want to see the debut years of the listed teams in the table. — Eugh jei♥Kaorin01:10, 19 March 2023 (UTC)reply
Just wondering if anyone has input regarding this before I proceed with the removal of the years in the prose, but not on the table. Thank you. — Eugh jei♥Kaorin12:02, 23 March 2023 (UTC)reply
I think you can go ahead with it. I also personally don't mind if you remove the debut years from the table, too. — wanna be your star,루입니다★15:26, 23 March 2023 (UTC)reply
I've been wondering since the union match ended. I feel that we need to do something about the tables because they are affecting the readability of the article, as per
WP:NOTSTATS. It's either simplify them, which I plan to do on the unit match results table, for example, not include them at all, or write it out as a prose. — Eugh jei♥Kaorin12:59, 23 March 2023 (UTC)reply
I suggest to remove the Team and Member column then add the MVP under the score on Result column.
Hmm... if the member involved gets removed from the show because of this, then we address it here. We'll see what Peak Time producers will say about it. Otherwise, this info will have to go to the group's Wikipedia article, whomever this is. — Eugh jei♥Kaorin08:44, 1 April 2023 (UTC)reply
Update: Production team released a
statement that Team 23:00 departed from the show.