This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Paul Noel Fiorino article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Paul Noel Fiorino was nominated as a Social sciences and society good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (July 11, 2024, reviewed version). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated. |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Dr. Swag Lord: Dr.Swag Lord, Ph.d ( talk · contribs) Hi, I'll review this. 01:07, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not) |
---|
|
Overall: |
· · · |
Main concern 1: The short length of the article trigged some alarm bells for me. After doing a very basic search, I realized there are plenty of sources available the nominator could have used to broaden the article. Sources not used include: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6]. As of now, the article is clearly not broad enough for GA standards.
Main concern 2: I'm seeing way too many questionable sources used. This is a BLP which requires high-quality sources. Questionable sources include:
Other concerns:
All-in-all, I believe this article qualifies for a WP:QF since it's a long way from meeting multiple GA criteria. Good luck on improving the article in the future! Dr. Swag Lord ( talk) 01:29, 11 July 2024 (UTC)