Pasto Ventura has been listed as one of the Geography and places good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: May 21, 2020. ( Reviewed version).

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Argentina Low‑importance This article is part of WikiProject Argentina, an attempt to expand, improve and standardise the content and structure of articles related to Argentina. If you would like to participate, you can improve Pasto Ventura, or sign up and contribute to a wider array of articles like those on our to do list.ArgentinaWikipedia:WikiProject ArgentinaTemplate:WikiProject ArgentinaArgentine articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Volcanoes Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Volcanoes, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of volcanoes, volcanology, igneous petrology, and related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VolcanoesWikipedia:WikiProject VolcanoesTemplate:WikiProject VolcanoesWikiProject Volcanoes articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future: Google Scholar Google

This review is transcluded from Talk:Pasto Ventura/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Hog Farm ( talk · contribs) 00:54, 20 May 2020 (UTC) reply

Criteria

1. Prose ✓ Pass

2. Verifiability ✓ Pass

3. Depth of Coverage ✓ Pass

4. Neutral ✓ Pass

5. Stable ✓ Pass

6. Illustrations  Likely

7. Miscellaneous ✓ Pass

Passing. Hog Farm ( talk) 14:38, 21 May 2020 (UTC) reply

Comments

1.

• Per MOS:OVERLINK, I'm not sure if Argentina needs linked

  Unlinked. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk) 10:39, 21 May 2020 (UTC) reply

• Link Los Nacimientos, make sure you get the right one from the dab page Los Nacimientos, they both seem to be in the applicable province

  Linked, bit I can't say that I am very sure on this. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk) 10:39, 21 May 2020 (UTC) reply

• "deposits of lapilli, lava bombs and scoria" - Link scoria

  Done. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk) 10:39, 21 May 2020 (UTC) reply

• "7 volcanic domes,[6] 2 maars and 3 tuff rings;" - I think MOS:NUMERALS applies here

  Done. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk) 10:39, 21 May 2020 (UTC) reply

• Mafic is a duplink
• All sections should be summarized in the lead, the climate and vegetation section isn't.

  Both done. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk) 10:39, 21 May 2020 (UTC) reply

2.

• The reference titles and author's name shouldn't be in allcaps
• Should refs 4 and 5 have accessdates since the sources are online?
• Ref 35 same as above

Done, added to 4 and 5 but not to 35 as that is a journal article. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk) 10:39, 21 May 2020 (UTC) reply

3.

4.

5.

6.

• Is an image of this freely available? I understand that with many subjects there isn't one.

  Not as far as I know. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk) 10:39, 21 May 2020 (UTC) reply

7.

Good work. Placing this one of hold, only a few things to address. Hog Farm ( talk) 22:42, 20 May 2020 (UTC) reply