Material from
Passive euthanasia was split to
Euthanasia on
December 16 2009. The former page's
history now serves to
provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted so long as the latter page exists. Please leave this template in place to link the article histories and preserve this attribution.
Merger proposal
In all honesty, I cannot see why
Passive euthanasia was spun out in the first place. Five sentences in two paragraphs, from a single source, could all be easily kept in this article without any loss of information. I would myself support such a merger, based on the above.
John Carter (
talk) 16:35, 16 December 2009 (UTC)reply
My primary motive for creating a separate entry on
passive euthanasia was that there was already a sub-division on
voluntary euthanasia and
involuntary euthanasia, which are ethical categories that are somewhat analoguous to the active/passive euthanasia dichotomy.
ADM (
talk) 16:37, 16 December 2009 (UTC)reply
That they are terms for similar events used by different communities of thought. I agree with your implication that a merge is warranted. As Passive euthanasia no longer exists as a stand-alone page, I imagine that you're arguing for a merge to
Euthanasia#Passive and active euthanasia. That seems reasonable for me, on the grounds of
short text and context.
Klbrain (
talk) 11:23, 25 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Oppose - I think these are separate topics,
Letting die encompasses more than just passive euthanasia, such as "letting five people get run over in the
Trolley problem, so we shouldn't merge to a more specific topic.
Psychastes (
talk) 20:58, 22 May 2024 (UTC)reply