This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hip hop, a collaborative effort to build a useful resource for and improve the coverage of
hip hop on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the
project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the
discussion.Hip hopWikipedia:WikiProject Hip hopTemplate:WikiProject Hip hopHip hop articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject R&B and Soul Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of R&B and Soul Music articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.R&B and Soul MusicWikipedia:WikiProject R&B and Soul MusicTemplate:WikiProject R&B and Soul MusicR&B and Soul Music articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Electronic music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Electronic music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Electronic musicWikipedia:WikiProject Electronic musicTemplate:WikiProject Electronic musicelectronic music articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles
Requested move 24 March 2017
The following is a closed discussion of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a
move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
It's the only song with the title that's one word. I say proceed with the change. We can always add a "not to be confused with" template.
CB19 (
talk)
03:56, 26 March 2017 (UTC)reply
We are going by that now as current title. The question for removing artist name is are all sources consistent "Passionfruit" one word, to which the answer is "no". At the very least (Fujifabric song) should be moved as that is what is likely to confuse people who think Drake's song is spelled "Passion Fruit" two words.
In ictu oculi (
talk)
10:35, 28 March 2017 (UTC)reply
Support I agree that we should proceed with the change as soon as possible. Searches for "Passionfruit" have seen a dramatic increase over past few days as it seems it will be the hit from the album. Make the change to avoid users getting confused
SomewhereInLondon (
talk)
04:46, 26 March 2017 (UTC)reply
Confused with what? Keeping "Drake" won't confuse people looking for the Drake song. In fact adding (Fujifabric song) to the other song might be more helpful.
In ictu oculi (
talk)
18:22, 26 March 2017 (UTC)reply
Support because there isn't another song called Passionfruit spelled as one word in the database so in my opinion I don't think it has to have Drake's name in the title to distinguish it. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Trillfendi (
talk •
contribs)
19:39, 26 March 2017 (UTC)reply
Because that song is irrelevant aka no one is going to look for its page...on top of that we would add Fujifabric to it's name and leave Drake's as (song).
BlaccCrab (
talk)
16:50, 29 March 2017 (UTC)reply
Support. The governing titling convention here is
WP:SONGDAB, according to which we do not include the artist name is the disambiguation if there's no other song of the same title.
Passionfruit (song) and
Passion Fruit (song) are distinct per
WP:SMALLDETAILS; hat notes between these two differently-spelled articles will be a better method of helping readers than adding verbiage to the titles.--
Cúchullaint/
c14:07, 31 March 2017 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a
move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
I check pages listed in
Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for
orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of
Passionfruit (song)'s orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.
I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not.
AnomieBOT⚡07:53, 31 August 2018 (UTC)reply