This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Cats. This project provides a central approach to
Cat-related subjects on Wikipedia. Please participate by editing
the article, and help us
assess and improve articles to
good and
1.0 standards, or visit the
wikiproject page for more details.CatsWikipedia:WikiProject CatsTemplate:WikiProject CatsCats articles
This article does not really serve any purpose, and is written in a humorous way (not appropriate for an article). Therefore, I believe it should be deleted.
Proposed deletion, done properly
In part a response to the sections above, and in part simply because I noticed this article here.
This article could, and probably should, be proposed for deletion because it was a proposed subspecies based on extremely dubious evidence and with no significant coverage. This is called failing
WP:GNG. Additionally, a
search on Google Scholar turns up very little.
Hey SilverTiger12 : this page was created already in 2008. It's not surprising that a search in internet turned up very little, because Deraniyagala and Mazak were most likely the only 2 people who ever wrote about this. This proposed subspecies is undoubtedly not valid, but this circumstance does not make the info on THIS page useless. --
BhagyaMani (
talk)
07:43, 3 October 2020 (UTC)reply
In which case, the proper place for this information and two references is on the
Tiger page under the Subspecies section. Perhaps a merge would be more appropriate than a deletion?--
SilverTiger12 (
talk)
14:44, 3 October 2020 (UTC)reply
As mentioned above, it's NOT a valid name. I already added it to the page about Deraniyagala, so that THIS page can be redirected to the respective section, if content will be deleted. --
BhagyaMani (
talk)
15:33, 3 October 2020 (UTC)reply