This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Animals Low‑importance Pambdelurion is within the scope of WikiProject Animals, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to animals and zoology. For more information, visit the project page.AnimalsWikipedia:WikiProject AnimalsTemplate:WikiProject Animalsanimal articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. WikiProject Animals To-do: history watch purge Here are some Open Tasks : Copyedit: Merge: GLAM/ARKive donated texts into articles about endangered species. Improve: Photoperiodism, Tool use by non-human animals, Omnivore, Animal suicide, Sphaerium beckmani (a species in family Sphaeriidae), Requests: Mammals: Invertebrates: Campocraspedon Fishes: Zaniolepis frenata Merge: GLAM/ARKive donated texts into articles about endangered species. Expand: Junqueira cow, Atka mackerel Nominate and vote: Science collaboration of the month, Article Improvement Drive, WikiProject Animals Collaboration Palaeontology Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Is Dinocaridida a phylum or a class? Taxbox for Anomalicaris shows

|domain = Eukaryota
|regnum = Animalia
|subregnum = Eumetazoa
|unranked_phylum = Bilateria
|superphylum = Ecdysozoa
|classis = † Dinocaridida

The taxon Anomalocarididae is missing there!

Could anyone please correct this and make it consistent? Thanks in advance Ernsts ( talk) 19:24, 22 February 2009 (UTC) reply

New specimen preserves details of cranial anatomy. This text of this article and that of Omnidens also need to be updated accordingly. Lythronaxargestes ( talk) 01:35, 3 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Would it be possible to use Robert Nicholls' restoration from the paper? Lythronaxargestes ( talk) 01:35, 3 October 2016 (UTC) reply

@ Lythronaxargestes:, give me a week or two, and I can update my picture.-- Mr Fink ( talk) 02:26, 3 October 2016 (UTC) reply