This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
The following is a closed discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the proposal was - the page was moved.
That fact doesn't, in and of itself, prove that the name is unique, because Wikipedia is a work in progress to which new articles can be added at any time. We require documented proof that people have actually researched whether the place properly qualifies for the page move or not, and the only way we can do that is to have a discussion on the talk page so that we have a permanent record of the process. Please read
WP:CANSTYLE, which makes it quite clear that the Canadian naming convention requires a move discussion in advance of a page move except in the most extraordinarily obvious circumstances.
Bearcat (
talk)
17:58, 7 June 2009 (UTC)reply
There's no point disambiguating it if there's no other article. All it takes is a simple Google search anyway. All the results are for the one in Quebec.
RandySavageFTW (
talk)
18:05, 7 June 2009 (UTC)reply
Then the discussion can be pretty much pro forma — but the rule for moving Canadian places to the undisambiguated title is that there needs to be a discussion first. For one thing, until such a discussion has actually taken place we would have no documented proof that anybody has done a Google search on the name.
Bearcat (
talk)
18:10, 7 June 2009 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.