This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a
list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the
full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sri Lanka, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Sri Lanka on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sri LankaWikipedia:WikiProject Sri LankaTemplate:WikiProject Sri LankaSri Lanka articles
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the
project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Although not disputing the incident itself what I am tagging this article is for it is lack of nuetrality in tone and original reseacg in some sections. These articles have to be re weriiten from a Neutral point of view without original research
RaveenS21:19, 7 February 2007 (UTC)reply
Not well cited because bbc didn't show any evidence that Tigers have done this perticular attack... Also the Tigers have denied that they have done it (that is somehow not written on this page). Also satp is not RS its QS so if you are going to add that then please add the proper suffix. Please clean up the problems before taking off the tag.
Watchdogb15:11, 25 February 2007 (UTC)reply
Rand.org conterdicts the bbc info therefore I it does not seem to be a RS. Also considering the reference of rand.org were newspaper that was released 4 years after the which is way too late (iwazaki's words not mine).
Watchdogb15:21, 25 February 2007 (UTC)reply
Did you check all the citation ?? I guess you didnt !! plus, 4 years is fully acceptable..I was debating about something came 10-20 years after !!! My advice, read all the sources(including UTHR) before even touching this article..many thanks--
Iwazaki15:59, 25 February 2007 (UTC)reply