The
Wikimedia Foundation's
Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see
WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see
WP:COIRESPONSE.
This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the
project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the
Internet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InternetWikipedia:WikiProject InternetTemplate:WikiProject InternetInternet articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer Security, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
computer security on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Computer SecurityWikipedia:WikiProject Computer SecurityTemplate:WikiProject Computer SecurityComputer Security articles
Thanks for your assistance so far @
North8000: and @
JavaHurricane:. As you both mentioned the references could do with some improvement, so there is an updated version in
User:RichardDigital47/sandbox I would ask to be considered. It strips out the primary references and focuses on media coverage, so it is hopefully an improvement on what is there already. In an ideal world, this will address the notices at the top of the page. If it doesn't, it would be great to be pointed in the right direction.
I'm kind of buried right now plus some compute problems are limiting my wiki time. I did a quick look and it looks like you added some good references. You don't necessarily have to remove the primary ones, but need to rely on them less to support the text. Make sure you develop some text from those new sources (I didn't review that in your draft). IMO if you just get this moved a few steps in the right direction it would be enough to remove the top level tags, even if some further improvement is needed. Again, I'm just doing quick stuff right now, but ping me if I can help. North8000 (
talk)
15:36, 28 May 2020 (UTC)reply
An impartial editor has reviewed the proposed edit(s) and asked the editor with a conflict of interest to go ahead and make the suggested changes.
Following discussions with North8000 and JavaHurricane, I have made an edit suggestion to further improve the PSA Certified page. There is a new version to be considered
here. There are two main aims with this. To improve referencing so the notices can be removed at the top of the page and the second is to add more technical information.
RichardDigital47 (
talk)
12:46, 2 July 2020 (UTC)reply
@
RichardDigital47: I just took a look and am not seeing any huge red flags. Given the work that you'd done with Java and North previously, and because of the substantial changes, you should probably go ahead and do the edits yourself for attribution purposes. Best,
Barkeep49 (
talk)
20:01, 29 July 2020 (UTC)reply
This
edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered.
Replace the industry adoption section with the following table. The concern is that the section could easily become inaccurate when in paragraph format, and is much harder to check for verification information.