GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Keresluna ( talk · contribs) 19:16, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
Rate | Attribute | Review Comment |
---|---|---|
1. Well-written: | ||
![]() |
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. | Very clear. |
![]() |
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. | One or two have redundancy but good enough. |
2. Verifiable with no original research: | ||
![]() |
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. | |
![]() |
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). | |
![]() |
2c. it contains no original research. | Some are not sourced. |
![]() |
2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism. | No apparent plagiarism or copyright violations. |
3. Broad in its coverage: | ||
![]() |
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. | |
![]() |
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). | |
![]() |
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. | No issues noted. |
![]() |
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. | Stable. |
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: | ||
![]() |
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. | Wish it had more media. For example, show the different compounds of each oxidation state of an element. |
![]() |
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. | No issues. |
![]() |
7. Overall assessment. | Fail. |
I dispute the judgement of criteria 6. I count 20 images, mostly related to the "oxidation state algorithm" - this may fulfil 6a (although I agree that more images may be needed). 19 use the CC-BY-SA 4.0 License, while 1 is in the Public Domain, and none need captions as they are explained inline - this fulfils 6b. I hope this helps! Bibeyjj ( talk) 14:19, 5 April 2021 (UTC)