The lead is a bit awkward. It needs to be a summary of the most important points in the article, so going into detail about the gold status isn't necessary—that can go in the article body.
If you can find them, more reviews (a mix of positive and negative, without undue weight) would be excellent.
I am fairly certain that the three reviews I actually have are the only three reviews that have been published- online at least. However, I will look into that at a later date.
J Milburn (
talk)
23:18, 20 June 2008 (UTC)reply
After some heavy Googling, all I am seeing in terms of reviews are those I already have, along with some customer reviews on shopping sites and blogs- nothing close to reliable that isn't already included.
J Milburn (
talk)
19:26, 21 June 2008 (UTC)reply
According to which guideline?
Wikipedia:Footnotes clearly says "Material may be referenced mid-sentence" and citing sources in this way means that exactly what is cited to which reference, and prevents a massive build-up of references.
J Milburn (
talk)
23:18, 20 June 2008 (UTC)reply
I would suggest doing a thorough copyedit for spelling, grammar, and flow. (You could get help from a
WP:LOCE member as well.) I didn't see any glaring errors, which is good.