A fact from Outrage! (game) appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 27 September 2006. The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Wikipedia is not a set of instructions of how to play a board game, nor is it a strategy guide. I am therefore going to remove a lot of this article. I know this is a bold move, but the stuff that should be put back in can be, whilst the stuff that should stay out can stay out. If anyone else disagrees, let's bring our disagreements her to Talk, ok?
Oh, and one other thing. What does "Difficulty: easy-hard" mean? I have changed it to medium. Batmanand | Talk 09:56, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
Doesn't FAO Shwartz sell a Monopoly Set For $100,000? —The preceding
unsigned comment was added by
71.208.146.231 (
talk •
contribs) .
I agree with the removal of the section on the strategy. Chess strategy and board game strategy are not exactly the same are they? 68.101.14.49 00:04, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
Image:Outrage box.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.