This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Out of Time (album) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
There seem to be several inaccuracies on this page. For example, "Near Wild Heaven" WAS a single in the UK. Also, "Radio Song" is described as a "megaselling hit", although it didn't chart in the US and only reached #28 in the UK.
Acegikmo1 20:23, 27 Jul 2004 (UTC)
Known for its eclectic nature, Out of Time's critical standing has lessened in later years, and is generally seen as being unbalanced and inconsistent by some reviewers.
Please do not remove professional reviews that are deemed acceptable by WikiProject Album standards. -- Fantailfan 22:50, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
I don't like this. Not at all. I'm trying to find out why this would be more useful than a straight track listing. I would like to revert it but am kind of tired of doing snap reverts without a reason. Unfortunately, I cannot contact the user who made the changes, because its an IP address. I'll give it a few days. -- Fantailfan 17:33, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
Is there really such instrument? I always assumed Peter Buck played electric mandolin in addition to his acoustic one. I don't actually own the album so I have no idea if this is correct. 24.91.251.238 21:28, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
Hey! Between the two of you, you have edited over 10,000 pages; I have edited over 3500. As a
disinterested observer, I am citing the unofficial "way too much time on our hands" doctrine: Let's
compromise!
a) Dudesleeper is correct on the dating. The reason for this is very simple: for many years now release dates have standardized on Tuesdays in America and Mondays in other places. The difference of a single day is not worth this craziness.
| Misc = {{Extra chronology 2 | Artist = | Type = | Last album = | This album = | Next album = }}
Discuss, please. -- Fantailfan ( talk) 20:15, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
I believe this article should be more detailed, if at all possible, so that it's at least the same length as the Green article.
Perhaps we should add a Reception section, perhaps even a legacy section, or extend the details section.
Thoughts? Alternative Idiot ( talk) 23:39, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
Prior to my first edit, the track listing showed side two as having its tracks numbered 6 to 11. I changed it to show numbers 1 to 6, citing the LP label/listing in my edit summary ( [1]). Which led to a content dispute:
I left a three-revert warning at Koavf's talk page, and opened this section to discuss, if there is still anything to discuss? Maybe I am missing something. Dan56 ( talk) 04:30, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
I added the quote and some highlights from the original Q Magazine review from 1991 by Mark Cooper. I left the review score from 2016 that it is currently there as I don't want to change it without consensus. The 1991 score was 5 stars. Karst ( talk) 14:27, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
I recently heard someone on a podcast (can’t remember which) state that the band didn’t come up with an album title till the end and quickly plucked “Out of time” from the chorus of Prince’s song 1999 (“2000 zero zero party over, oops OUT OF TIME”). Is that true? If so that should be mentioned in this article. 24.22.151.109 ( talk) 02:47, 24 October 2023 (UTC)