This article is within the scope of WikiProject Buses, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
buses on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusesWikipedia:WikiProject BusesTemplate:WikiProject Busesbus transport articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York (state), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the
U.S. state of
New York on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York (state)Wikipedia:WikiProject New York (state)Template:WikiProject New York (state)New York (state) articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the
United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
I have removed the image gallery within the article itself, and moved the whole thing to a page on Wikimedia Commons (see
Commons:Orion Bus Industries). I've linked that new page to the article. I've also improved it a bit, with better organization as well as a few new pictures. This move also entailed moving some images to Commons, which also benefits the project overall.
Why did I move it all? Bottom line is that I hate galleries directly in articles. However, this is also a great improvement over before, since it makes the article less cluttered, and better organizes the gallery.
SchuminWeb (
Talk)
02:41, 17 September 2006 (UTC)reply
I've added the cleanup tag because the sections on the products need to be reworked. They presently look like a strange sort of list, and read like it's advertising, even if that's not the intention. These ought to get refactored into true paragraphs and reworded to sound less like an ad.
SchuminWeb (
Talk)
10:42, 3 July 2007 (UTC)reply
The products section was converted to a table, for both current and discontinued. I am proceeding to do the same for the New Flyer and Gillig articles. --
AEMoreira042281 (
talk)
07:04, 19 January 2008 (UTC)reply
I have just modified 2 external links on
Orion International. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
this tool.
The following is a closed discussion of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a
move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Oppose: Article cites no source for that renaming, and the editor who proposed the page move has never responded to TheBirdsShedTears's question above, "Any evidence?", in the three weeks since the question was asked.
SJ Morg (
talk)
09:18, 2 April 2022 (UTC)reply
Oppose per SJ Morg. Also, the
WP:COMMONNAME is what matters, not the latest official name (whatever that was). That seems especially true for this company, since it seems to be defunct (as a company). So what matters is what name it was primarily known by, not whatever name was adopted last before it ceased to exist. —
BarrelProof (
talk)
17:58, 2 April 2022 (UTC)reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.