This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Sociology This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Is there reasons why this article is mostly un-sourced. How can it be left on Wikipedia when it is so un-sourced? there are also sections which should be removed Happydaise ( talk) 12:14, 28 November 2016 (UTC) reply

• @ Happydaise: Feel free to add sources or to remove parts that you think should be removed (but, you have to explain removal). Being unsourced is not one of WP:criteria for deletion. Vanjagenije (talk) 14:27, 28 November 2016 (UTC) reply

How do we go about adding something at the top of the article - to make it clear that it is un-sourced? Happydaise ( talk) 23:42, 28 November 2016 (UTC) reply

• @ Happydaise: Actually there is already a message at the top of the article that reads "This article includes a list of references, but its sources remain unclear because it has insufficient inline citations." Vanjagenije (talk) 00:02, 29 November 2016 (UTC) reply

oh okay then. Thanks for taking the time to answer that question. Happydaise ( talk) 00:05, 29 November 2016 (UTC) reply

I just began some type of change to this article. the more i read the more it dawned on me that the whole thing would need to be re-written. Okay my question is what should be done with an article like this - that is so shoddily written that it appears un-salvageable? Happydaise ( talk) 06:42, 30 November 2016 (UTC) reply

@ Happydaise: In such cases we usually remove all excessive unsourced badly written text, and leave only some basic information. Vanjagenije (talk) 07:59, 30 November 2016 (UTC) reply

That makes more sense and appreciate you getting back to me on my question too. Happydaise ( talk) 08:20, 30 November 2016 (UTC) reply

I started doing this but I give up -the whole article needs to be re-written i think. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Happydaise ( talk • contribs) 09:38, 30 November 2016 (UTC) reply