![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
organic cotton is good for babies —Preceding unsigned comment added by 123.211.161.134 ( talk) 07:57, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Organic cotton. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 07:29, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
As noted by others, this page is not neutral, but rather is a promotional piece for organic cotton. Moreover, some of the factual material is already found at the main page for Cotton. Additional material from this page should be moved to the cotton page, since organic cotton is one method of cotton cultivation; the method can be compared to conventional and other growing methods on the primary page.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Epitrix ( talk • contribs) 1:28, 15 June 2020 (UTC)
The current article does not have any real mention of the certification of organic cotton, the process, how the process has changed over time. That could be helpful and some of the other data mentioned on the page is somewhat dated. Additional reliable sources could help improve this page. I am also considering adding an external link to the Global Organic Textile Standard (GOTS) webpage. There is a lot of valuable information on the page and they appear to be either the largest or most trusted certification organization for this type of resource which visitors to this article might find valuable. Adam MLIS ( talk) 00:56, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
Does Global Organic Textile Standard (GOTS) deserve its own article in Wikipedia? It looks like a significant certification program, but there is currently nothing in the system. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Kahscho (
talk •
contribs)
01:13, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Due to the higher cost of switching to organic cotton farming and initial lower yields, many smaller farms are not able to make the transition to organic cotton farming. That combined with an increased global demand for organic cotton a new temporary standard has been created where organic practices are put in place during the average 3 year transition and certification process takes place. During this time, some manufacturers are embracing this to help support the transition by paying a premium for this in-transition cotton to help these farmers. So essentially a new temporary standard for cotton grown organically, just not officially certified yet.
A couple different names that this is being called is "in-conversion cotton", "transitional cotton", or "cotton in conversion". That is a little background and this could be definitely included in the article either in a current section or a new section. Some reliable sources might be difficult to find, but if you search, you might find some good sources if you are able to contribute in this way. Adam MLIS ( talk) 01:23, 30 August 2023 (UTC)