This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Pakistan Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pakistan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pakistan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PakistanWikipedia:WikiProject PakistanTemplate:WikiProject PakistanPakistan articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Pakistani politics. Islam Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Islam, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Islam-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IslamWikipedia:WikiProject IslamTemplate:WikiProject IslamIslam-related articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Law Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Is there a reason this was categorized under "obsolete biological theories"? I don't see what this has to do with biology in any way. Removed that category XinaNicole ( talk) 07:55, 29 February 2012 (UTC) reply

@ FreeatlastChitchat, I will point you to WP:BRD, WP:TALKDONTREVERT, and WP:EW. Stop reverting justified deletions arbitrarily.

The sourcing is there, why are you removing sourced content? FreeatlastChitchat ( talk) 03:08, 31 August 2015 (UTC) reply

As per NPOV. Use neutral 3rd party sources only please. Thanks Code16 ( talk) 03:09, 31 August 2015 (UTC) reply

The source is a third party source lol. FreeatlastChitchat ( talk) 03:11, 31 August 2015 (UTC) reply

@ FreeatlastChitchat: this source is unreliable and WP:PEACOCK.-- Human3015 ^{Send WikiLove}  05:58, 31 August 2015 (UTC) reply

Hi How are you I need to help 91.74.225.203 ( talk) 00:10, 22 April 2022 (UTC) reply

Please I'm waiting 91.74.225.203 ( talk) 00:12, 22 April 2022 (UTC) reply