This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mammals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mammal-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MammalsWikipedia:WikiProject MammalsTemplate:WikiProject Mammalsmammal articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Primates, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Primates on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PrimatesWikipedia:WikiProject PrimatesTemplate:WikiProject PrimatesPrimate articles
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 25 March 2020 and 12 June 2020. Further details are available
on the course page. Student editor(s):
Alyssaaguilera. Peer reviewers:
Avielman,
Rpere110.
Oppose This is a harder area to provide sources to but follows a good progression with the other three articles. It can be improved though I agree. The subject is entirely different than the Hom article and that clad in this article is a good place to keep up with future developments that might be confirmed by secondary sources.--
Akrasia25 (
talk)
17:10, 23 December 2019 (UTC)reply
I think I see the reason for the lack of references. I added this secondary reference and along the way it was deleted accidentally or intentionally (vandalism?). I can start to add it back.--
Akrasia25 (
talk)
17:19, 23 December 2019 (UTC)reply
The orangutanâhuman last common ancestor was tailless, and had a broad flat rib cage. The orangutanâhuman last common ancestor had a larger body size, larger brain, and in females, the canine teeth had started to shrink like their descendants.[1]:â201â Great apes have sweat glands in their armpit versus in their chest like lesser monkeys[1]:â195â
This is definitely NOT a creationist source! It is my go to book on refuting creationist nonsense. It you had read the arguments for those references you would see the connections to the missing link and the reason for this article. The bibliography alone is worth the price of the book. I am reverting back to that version as there are too many changes to add these references back in.--
Akrasia25 (
talk)
17:28, 23 December 2019 (UTC)reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
References
^
abKane, Jonathan; Willoughby, Emily; Michael Keesey, T. (2016-12-31). God's Word or Human Reason?: An Inside Perspective on Creationism.
ISBNÂ
9781629013725.
Dryopithecini
I moved hidden text here to better understand the editor's point.
The study of Dryopithecini as an outgroup to Hominidae suggests a date earlier than 8 million years ago for the Homininae-Ponginae split.
"why 8 mya, when Dryopithecini are older than 12 mya?"