![]() | Optical properties of carbon nanotubes has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
![]() | A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the "
Did you know?" column on
October 18, 2008. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that
carotene can be used to alter the
optical properties of
carbon nanotubes? |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
References and introduction have been updated as suggested. References are scientifically formatted. As they are journal references, they do not need publisher and access dates. NIMSoffice ( talk) 05:27, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
Re: Image looks screwed up, and Copyrights (comments on DWNTpl.jpg by Headbomb). The suggested split of the image would violate the copyright. Therefore, the criticized image is replaced. There is and was no copyright violation. There is no sense discussing the previous image here, and off course it is not a matter of amateurism. If you wish more information (e.g. on details of that 3-D PLE mapping), write at my talk page. Thank you for questioning. NIMSoffice ( talk) 03:47, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
Re: GA On hold by Crystal whacker. The introduction has been expanded as suggested. NIMSoffice ( talk) 06:40, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
Regarding the figure captions, the van Hove image does not need a separate caption (it is inside the image). NIMSoffice ( talk) 01:58, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
The intro is waay to short for a GA! Nergaal ( talk) 23:26, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
This article does not meet the good article criteria and has therefore failed its nomination. Issues include:
Once these issues have been resolved, please feel free to renominate the article. Thanks! Gary King ( talk) 20:12, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
Compare the image found in [1] with this one [2] to see what I mean. Headbomb { ταλκ κοντριβς – WP Physics} 08:49, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
It appears (from a couple of Science articles I read recently) that the optical absorption/emission are dictated by exciton formation. I'm not well versed enough in the field but thought I would point it out for someone that is. The articles are The optical resonances in carbon nanotubes arise from excitons and The optical resonances in carbon nanotubes arise from excitons. Amccaugh ( talk) 13:57, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
Oh and another thing, the copyrights of that image belong to the American Chemical Society. If you are not the American Chemical Society, then you shouldn't say you are the copyright holder of that image, or digitally manipulated versions of it. Saying you are might lead to severe repercussions both in and outside wikipedia. Headbomb { ταλκ κοντριβς – WP Physics} 12:18, 8 December 2008 (UTC)