![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I think a background section is needed to clarify the cause of this ( personally I think was just a bunch of lunatics pushing for a fratricide war ) but to reduce the origin of this to just the beagle islands is frankly false. At the time, there was a perceived idea (among argentines) that chile was always looking for gain any possible meter of patagonia, we can mention countless "incidents" between gendarmes and carabineros along the century involving moving border landmarks ("hitos") -- Jor70 ( talk) 15:58, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
Yes, there is a missed background common to the 7 articles of the serie "Beagle conflict" and should not repeated 7x. Furthermore somewhere must be a limit between "Beagle conflict#(missed section)" and "Argentina–Chile relations". The former is included in the latter but both are different oriented.
I tried to illustrate the missed background in the section Papal mediation in the Beagle conflict#Interests of the parties, but I agree that this section could be expanded and put in the main article.
-- Keysanger ( talk) 08:23, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
Already has the expand template, we need to make it visible so others editors may help, specially chileans. The things I added are well know and could be easily find in their respective articles. I restore it -- Jor70 ( talk) 22:25, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
Not true, in 1982 the submarines and the carriers were operational, the thing they discovered to late that torpedoes didnt work and there was 0 wind just the day the carrier need to launch their aircraft is another (sad) story. Anyway Im trying to show to equipment at disposal not matter their circumstantial location. Also, I only add the weapons systems that are obviously confirmed, click on every article and you see the story there. Regarding the chilean aircraft (F-5,Hunter,A-37) I prefer to leave that to a chilean but I could them too if you wish -- Jor70 ( talk) 23:26, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
Please, take a look in WP:Verifiability. Probably you know what you write but I don't know it and want to know it. It will be very easy for you to deliver the sources as you say that it is well known. Sorry, we need a little bit more time to write a better article:
By the way, do you think it is actually needed that table?. I think the given military expenditures are enough.As you can see there is a lot of figures to show, but the article doesn't become better with such contradictory and uncertain numbers -- Keysanger 14:27, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
are that references?
-- Keysanger 20:00, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
All's well that ends well. -- Keysanger 17:56, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
The section doesnt seem right it talks about a lot of events after 1978 which can not really be relevant to the Operation. An aftermath section is waranted for some of subsequent events but most of this does not seem relevant. MilborneOne ( talk) 20:28, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
![]() |
An image used in this article,
File:Galtieri.op.soberania.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at
Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests February 2012
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Galtieri.op.soberania.jpg) This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image -- CommonsNotificationBot ( talk) 20:45, 22 February 2012 (UTC) |
Hi, I just found confusing the following patagraph as is unclear who is actually quoted:
After the invasion of the Falklands on 2 April 1982, the Argentine junta planned the military occupation of the disputed islands in the Beagle channel, as stated by Brigadier Basilio Lami Dozo, chief of the Argentine Air Force during the Falklands war, in an interview with the Argentine magazine Perfil:
L.F. Galtieri: "[Chileans] have to know that what we are doing now, because they will be the next in turn".[50]
As both Lami Dozo and Galtieri are mentioned but is unclear who was really interviewed by "Perfil" magazine. And I can't access the referenced issue of thsi magazine to clarify. Can anyone please help? Thanks & regards, DPdH ( talk) 01:56, 20 January 2015 (UTC)
Editor KeySanger reverted my edit without comment. The changes I made were:
|author-separator=
, |author-name-separator=
, |separator=
because these parameters have been deprecated and no longer perform the functions for which they were originally conceived.|chapter=
because that parameter is not supported by {{
citation}}
when |newspaper=
has an assigned value.I believe that my edits were correct and that the reversion was inappropriate.
— Trappist the monk ( talk) 13:41, 21 July 2015 (UTC)
{{
citation}}
template at
Operation_Soberanía#cite_note-belicismoargentino-8, and once as an exact copy of that {{citation}}
template in §
External links. I removed this latter per
WP:ELDUP.{{
harvnb}}
templates so that the links work and removed the deprecated parameters from the Amato citation template. The template should probably be moved to the top of the bibliography so that it is in alphabetical order.Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on Operation Soberanía. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.seprin.com/menu/notas6620.htm{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.uvm.cl/sitio_iri/monografias2005/RECIPROCIDAD%20EN%20LAS%20RELACIONES%20CHILE%20ARGENTINA%20-%20Andr%E9s%20Oelckers.pdfWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 21:14, 25 May 2017 (UTC)