This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indonesia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Indonesia and
Indonesia-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IndonesiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndonesiaTemplate:WikiProject IndonesiaIndonesia articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a
list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the
full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Netherlands, an attempt to create, expand, and improve articles related to the
Netherlands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the
project page where you can join the project or contribute to the
discussion.NetherlandsWikipedia:WikiProject NetherlandsTemplate:WikiProject NetherlandsNetherlands articles
Hum, yes i agreed that the title are pretty inappropriate. This is one of two Politionele acties. I suggest, instead of merging this to that, Politionele acties should be splitted to two different article (this article, and the 1st one). They are two separate events. As an illustration, of course you won't merge WW I and WW II. Peace. --Nielswik(talk)10:19, 30 November 2006 (UTC)reply
lol - I am sorry but WW1 and WW2 is (to be polite) an "weak" comparison. Slightly different scale. But, at least you can see the problem with the title (actually, politionele acties is also poor) but i still think the two topics are better together. THey are closely related and even together they are no where near too long. I want to start transferring data but there are no references. I will work on i later. --
Merbabu10:27, 30 November 2006 (UTC)reply
That illustration was exaggerated. but these two aggressions are different. The first one was at July-August 1947. then there is a ceasefire (Renville agreement). At December 1948 dutch said they were no longer bonded to that agreement and launch its second so-called "police action"s. Aren't they different to you? Peace. --Nielswik(talk)10:39, 30 November 2006 (UTC)reply
Well, of course they are different - but related. But, rather than split being based on difference, normally it is based on lenght - as an article gets long it might be split. The article (if combined) is no where near too long. As for the Revolution article, i don't think it is too long. Rather Surabaya was split off cos it was bigger than the other sections. Well, i will think about it. I won't change it - for now. :) --
Merbabu14:22, 30 November 2006 (UTC)reply
Clean up required
Someone really needs to do a lot work on this article. The grammar and spelling is awful! I can't understand what its saying a lot of the time. Clean-up required! --
Manxruler23:45, 7 February 2007 (UTC)reply
References
I know quite a few references on this subject, but they are all in Dutch. Does the English version of Wikipedia allow for references in other languages?
HJRO22:46, 10 November 2007 (UTC)reply
English refs are of course preferred, but in lieu of others, non-English language refs can be used. See
WP:RSUE. Please provide in-line references, rather than a list at the end. Thanks! --
Merbabu23:38, 10 November 2007 (UTC)reply
Can anyone clarify this?
Under Battle: First Attack:
"At 05:30, Maguwo airport and the radio station at military aircraft including Yogyakarta was bombed by the ML-KNIL."