![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||
|
SSG Cornelius Seon (Retired) 18:16, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
There is no such word as "nightfighter", and why would anyone think that there should be? Always use "night fighter", as has always been used in the U.S.A.A.F., the U.S.A.F., and any of their predecessors. Also, "nightfighter" automatically turns any wikilink red. Why didn't anyone see this and check into it? Simply correcting the word to "night fighter" in this article change the links into genuine wikilinks in this article.
Sorry, but I get really outraged when people do not proofread anything carefully and they do not doublecheck anything.
Here is a quotations from the Wikipedia article about one of the night fighter squadrons that is mentioned in the present article:
"Established as a Night Fighter Squadron in January 1943, it was trained in Florida with a specialized version of the A-20 Havoc modified for night combat."
"It was deployed to Twelfth Air Force in Algeria in May 1943 and equipped with Bristol Beaufighters. Then it carried out defensive night patrols over Allied territory during the campaign in North African, and it also carried out night interdiction raids on Axis positions in Algeria and Tunisia."
I'm not sure we should use that Osprey book (part of the men at arms series) as a source in that article, particularly for the Coastal Divisions. Sometime last year I tried to sort this out and found great differences between the theoretical organisation of these units given in some sources and the actual organisation on the terrain. From that information I could not piece together the attachments of most of these regiments. The current listing in the article looks good, but is likely to be incorrect, while I like the Osprey books on other time periods I've never found them useful for WWII. Though I haven't read this particular one (I probably have a copy somewhere and will take a look if you think I should).-- Caranorn ( talk) 11:50, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
There are inconsistency in the article: 1th is not the truth. It may be 1st or it may be 4th, 5th ... It is possible that the number is wrong or the “th” is wrong. I do not know what of that is wrong or true. Please check it. -- Diwas ( talk) 12:22, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
![]() |
An image used in this article, File:No. 38 Wing Horsa Glider.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale as of 18 November 2011
Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
This notification is provided by a Bot -- CommonsNotificationBot ( talk) 12:56, 18 November 2011 (UTC) |
![]() |
An image used in this article, File:Montgomery and Patton Discuss Operations in Sicily.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale as of 3 December 2011
Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
This notification is provided by a Bot -- CommonsNotificationBot ( talk) 10:50, 3 December 2011 (UTC) |
Please, have a look on the French wikipedia page. You can find a complete order of battle.
Best regards,
Sapiens. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.2.250.38 ( talk) 18:28, 3 January 2014 (UTC)