This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
is a (1950s) Seamaster that says "Antimagnetic" on the dial necessarily a fake? -- Cherubino ( talk) 19:05, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
The list of celebrity owners in the lead has been picked in order to make the watch look naff - Jeremy Clarkson? Prince William? It's too obvious; people will just dismiss it as lefty trolling. 80.99.56.84 ( talk) 22:05, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
I was thinking of this line in particular;
"This is the beginning of a new generation of watch movements, re-institutionalizing the mechanical movement that once was deemed obsolete by the quartz movement of the 1970s to the present day." It doesn't strike me as being an objective statement. Meltingpot ( talk) 20:51, 4 December 2018 (UTC)
Completely agree, not to mention this: "The watch is continued to be loved by collectors and enthusiasts as a ‚modern classic‘ with an outermost ‚go anywhere‘ attitude and elegance of a dress watch." Marr1977 ( talk) 20:44, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered. |
I have a declared COI on a related subject, and noticed that the recently a recently announced Omega Seamaster model is missing from this list. Please add to the models section
Thank you,
Naadobea1776 ( talk) 21:37, 7 July 2019 (UTC)
References
Regards, Spintendo 22:40, 7 July 2019 (UTC)