This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Why was this page previously at Olmstead v. California? john k 23:27, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
That's nothing! Was it really $10,300? ^ $10000 in 1928 is closer to $110000 in Jan. 2008.
A significant portion of the wording on this page is quoted directly from the Olmstead decision, without quotation marks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 18.202.1.200 ( talk) 00:00, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
Justice Stone's statement says that he concurs in the opinions of Justices Holmes and Brandeis and agrees Justice Butler insofar as he addresses the constitutional question. In the table on the side, it lists this as a separate dissent. In older US Reports, it often says Justice x, with whom Justice y concurs, dissenting. Since Stone's statement is hardly a dissent in itself and he says he 'concurs' with Holmes and Brandeis, should we not just say he joined Holmes and Brandeis?
Should it not thus be: Dissent Holmes, joined by Stone Dissent Brandeis, joined by Stone Dissent Butler, joined by Stone (in part) H.E. Nightingale ( talk) 10:38, 7 February 2021 (UTC)