The route description makes no mention of the northern terminus. You should also mention and cite the length in the prose of the RD, as right now it only appears in the Lead and Infobox.
Has anything happened since the 1940s? If there is such a great gap between the last upgrade and now, you should specify that the route has remain unchanged since then. It also puffs up the history another sentence.
Have you looked through Flickr to see if Doug Kerr has any photos of this route to help illustrate the article? If there are none then that is unfortunate but not a GA criterion
Everything looks good now. I can't find anything else to be picky about, so for me that qualifies the article for some shiny green bling. Passed! - ʄɭoʏɗiaɲτ¢05:39, 8 November 2011 (UTC)reply