This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
"The substitution or omission of a # sign is because of technical restrictions"?-- andreasegde ( talk) 00:23, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
Should the 2007 REM cover be in this article so prominently? I dont think it is relevent in the broader context —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mu301nh ( talk • contribs) 10:33, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
do we want the bit about how the #9 figured in Lennon's life? yes, it's a bit trivial. but it is about the recurring #9. i could go either way, but it does add a bit to what would be pretty stumpy. as far as "sources" go, the dates are included in wiki articles; the rest is simple math. what does everyone else think? Hotcop2 ( talk) 13:00, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
He does speak of the #9 to some extent. He didn't discuss 1980 however. Hotcop2 ( talk) 18:10, 13 March 2009 (UTC) {{ quote}}
It’s just a number that follows me around, but, numerologically, apparently I’m a number six or a three or something, but it’s all part of nine
— John Lennon, 1980, [1]
References
How does a 1980s (according to its own article) genre belong here? Was it put here just as a joke? Radiopathy •talk• 17:45, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
No reliable source in eight months' time; I'm deleting it. Radiopathy •talk• 19:16, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
Not of that genres, and doesn't exist reference to put that two genres-- JamesMarshallHendrix ( talk) 02:22, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
Undoubtedly John Lennon's finest musical composition. I've added a short passage, together with two sources, to highlight the fact that Number 9 Dream is Kate Bush's personal favourite song. Admittedly one of the sources is only a blog, but it's pretty uncontentious. Multiculturalist ( talk) 00:37, 10 April 2011 (UTC)
I would have thought UK English for a UK musician, but not. Any ideas why? Red Jay ( talk) 18:33, 20 August 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Number 9 Dream. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 12:15, 21 December 2017 (UTC)