This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bangladesh, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Bangladesh on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BangladeshWikipedia:WikiProject BangladeshTemplate:WikiProject BangladeshBangladesh articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pakistan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Pakistan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PakistanWikipedia:WikiProject PakistanTemplate:WikiProject PakistanPakistan articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of
History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology articles
I check pages listed in
Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for
orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of
Non-cooperation movement (1971)'s orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.
Reference named "Banglapedia":
From
Dhirendranath Datta:
"Language Movement". Banglapedia – The National Encyclopedia of Bangladesh. Asiatic Society of Bangladesh. Archived from
the original on 7 March 2016. Retrieved 26 July 2015.
From
Prime Minister of Bengal: Alamgir, Mohammad (2012).
"Nazimuddin, Khwaja". In
Islam, Sirajul; Jamal, Ahmed A. (eds.). Banglapedia: National Encyclopedia of Bangladesh (Second ed.).
Asiatic Society of Bangladesh. On 1 December 1941 he resigned from the cabinet because of dissension between Huq and Jinnah. During the Shyama-Huq coalition (1942 to 1943) he acted as the Leader of the Opposition.
I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not.
AnomieBOT⚡00:27, 14 October 2022 (UTC)reply
March 23
Diplomatic missions do not fly the flag of the host country. The paragraph is making an unusual, unverified claim that diplomatic missions flew the flag of Pakistan or Bangladesh on that day. Diplomatic missions only fly the flag of their own country, never the host country. Under the
Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations, the premises of a diplomatic mission is the domain of that mission's state.
Solomon The Magnifico (
talk)
12:51, 26 October 2022 (UTC)reply
@
Solomon The Magnifico: Maybe there was exception in the past. Also the thing is covered by a source of Prothom Alo, a reliable newspaper. I believe that the same can be found in books written about non-cooperation movement.
Mehedi Abedin22:46, 26 October 2022 (UTC)reply
No, I'm sure there was no exception in 1971. This has been a norm and tradition for many decades before 1971. Diplomatic missions will only fly flags of their own country. To suggest otherwise will be a breach of longstanding norms. Is the source an opinion piece? I doubt it is a Prothom Alo report. The claim is highly unlikely to stand the test of verification.
Solomon The Magnifico (
talk)
23:05, 26 October 2022 (UTC)reply
Also, there is a book that verified the claim.
Haider, Rashid (1989). অসহযোগ আন্দোলন: একাত্তর [Non-Cooperation Movement: Seventy-one] (in Bengali).
Dhaka:
Bangla Academy. p. 93. – The fact was mentioned in that source. If I search then maybe I will able find more sources that support the claim.
Mehedi Abedin00:11, 27 October 2022 (UTC)reply
@
Mehediabedin: and @
MS Sakib: maybe protestors broke into the missions and hoisted the Bangladesh flag on the flagpoles? It is highly unlikely that a professional diplomatic mission like those of the UK, Indonesia, Iran, China and Soviet Union would fly the flag of any entity other than their own national flag.--
Solomon The Magnifico (
talk)
14:51, 28 October 2022 (UTC)reply
The mission and its head shall have the right to use the flag and emblem of the sending State on the premises of the mission, including the residence of the head of the mission, and on his means of transport.
Plus, why on earth would the Chinese, Indonesian and Iranian consulates fly the
flag of Pakistan? The British mission was a Deputy High Commission, not a sub-high commission. There are many inaccuracies. I doubt the sentence has been properly translated from
Bangla. I think both of you are getting the translation wrong.--
Solomon The Magnifico (
talk)
15:01, 28 October 2022 (UTC)reply
@
Solomon The Magnifico: Actually it was protesters and students who hoisted the flags. And I changed "sub-high commission" into "deputy high commission". Also fixed the issues. Now I think there isn’t contradiction in the passage.
Mehedi Abedin00:49, 29 October 2022 (UTC)reply