This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 64 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 7 sections are present. |
A fact from Non-convexity (economics) appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 7 February 2011 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
There were 2.5 thousand viewers. Kiefer.Wolfowitz ( Discussion) 19:09, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
Perhaps the words "locally Lipschitz" should link to Lipschitz continuity? (Collin237) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 166.217.154.85 ( talk) 05:15, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
Tjalling Koopmans was the first to proof the non-existence of Walras-equilibria when production sets are non-convex. A reference to the "Three Essays on the State of Economic Science" is in place. One should include a graphics of his simple but enlightening example. This may help to understand the problem of non-convex production for non-scientists.-- Hjsalchow ( talk) 20:09, 10 May 2011 (UTC)