This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject European Union, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the
European Union on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.European UnionWikipedia:WikiProject European UnionTemplate:WikiProject European UnionEuropean Union articles
The following is a closed discussion of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a
move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: Moved. The majority of editors commenting do not think that the punctuation is sufficient to distinguish from other topics with very similar names. (
non-admin closure) (
t ·
c) buidhe06:32, 30 May 2021 (UTC)reply
Support: Like many of the other entries on the dab page, the medium of this message was primarily auditory, not written, so neither commas nor full stops were being used at the time. —
BarrelProof (
talk)
23:32, 16 May 2021 (UTC)reply
OK, I saw it. I assume she didn't write it and that the original was delivered orally. Personally, I seldom use punctuation marks when I speak (or sing), and I suspect that applies to her as well. Even if I wrote something, in most cases I wouldn't expect people to remember which punctuation marks I was using. —
BarrelProof (
talk)
01:53, 17 May 2021 (UTC)reply
Support:
WP:DIFFPUNCT says [t]he general approach is that whatever readers might type in the search box, they are guided as swiftly as possible to the topic they might reasonably be expected to be looking for. In this case, I do not think it is reasonable to assume that someone who enters "No. No. No." into the search box is definitely looking for the Margaret Thatcher quote and not for any of the topics at
No, No, No.
Rublov (
talk)
13:56, 27 May 2021 (UTC)reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
"..the final part of her statement a reference to the 1976 sterling crisis under a Labour government"
Not only a reference to that. The Wilson government of the 1960s spent many months under IMF 'discipline'. This has largely been successfully expunged from the collective memory through its being ignored by present-day historians, but it is referred to in
Richard Crossman's Diaries of a Cabinet Minister and in some academic papers, for example
here.Harfarhs (
talk)
16:52, 29 December 2023 (UTC)reply