![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | ← | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 |
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on New World Order (conspiracy theory). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 11:18, 14 December 2017 (UTC)
Wall Street, The Federal Reserve, and the Warburg Family needs to be addressed.Paul Warburg, in order to be on the board of the Fed left Wells Fargo and Jacob Schiff replaced him.This is a bias and partisan article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:5B0:51CB:7B38:910E:A082:9C63:33DB ( talk) 15:11, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
This whole article reads like a conspiracy theory about right-wing conspiracy theories. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.69.234.225 ( talk) 09:13, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
The article makes no attempt to discuss the subject objectively and should be deleted. Bougatsa42 ( talk) 08:15, 28 March 2018 (UTC)
Under section: Criticism
"Domhoff, a research professor in psychology and sociology who studies theories of power, wrote in 2005 an essay entitled There Are No Conspiracies. He says that for this theory to be true it required several "wealthy and highly educated people" to do things that don't "fit with what we know about power structures". Claims that this will happen goes back decades and have always been proved wrong."
"Partridge, a contributing editor to the global affairs magazine Diplomatic Courier, wrote a 2008 article entitled One World Government: Conspiracy Theory or Inevitable Future? He says that if anything nationalism, which is the opposite of a global government, is rising. He also says that attempts at creating global governments or global agreements "have been categorical failures" and where "supranational governance exist they are noted for their bureaucracy and inefficiency."
"Warning of the threat to American democracy posed by right-wing populist movements led by demagogues who mobilize support for mob rule or even a fascist revolution by exploiting the fear of conspiracies, Berlet writes that "Right-wing populist movements can cause serious damage to a society because they often popularize xenophobia, authoritarianism, scapegoating, and conspiracism. This can lure mainstream politicians to adopt these themes to attract voters, legitimize acts of discrimination (or even violence), and open the door for revolutionary right-wing populist movements, such as fascism, to recruit from the reformist populist movements."
"Hughes, a professor of religion, warns that no religious idea has greater potential for shaping global politics in profoundly negative ways than "the new world order". He writes in a February 2011 article entitled Revelation, Revolutions, and the Tyrannical New World Order that "the crucial piece of this puzzle is the identity of the Antichrist, the tyrannical figure who both leads and inspires the new world order". This has in turn been the Soviet Union and the Arab world. He says that inspires believers to "welcome war with the Islamic world" and opens the door to nuclear holocaust." "
( gnanvit ( talk) 11:00, 2 May 2018 (UTC))
![]() | This
edit request to
New World Order (conspiracy theory) has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Gyorgy Soros = NWO Liston62 ( talk) 00:41, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
tendencious to label articles with the tag "(conspiracy theory)"
It is obvious — Preceding unsigned comment added by 37.230.20.240 ( talk) 12:45, 20 July 2018 (UTC)
I suppose it doesn't matter that Chip Berlet, who is invoked throughout this article, is a Communist of the Enver Hoxha school (that's Communist Albania, hardly a haven of free-love, free-thought, or hippie anarchism). And that's not even a "conspiracy theory." You can read all about Berlet at http://www.discoverthenetworks.com/individualProfile.asp?indid=1243.
I remain mystified at how people who advocate state regulation of everything in existence see themselves as enemies of "authoritarianism." To advocate government control of everything, even even by a benevolent government, is by definition authoritarian and even totalitarian. I suppose it's the same sloppy thought that has them condemning some "nationalisms" while supporting others (you know, Arafat, Sinn Fein, Castro, ETA, etc.). 98.66.43.239 ( talk) 00:44, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
the paragraph:
Observers note that the galvanizing of right-wing populist conspiracy theorists such as Linda Thompson, Mark Koernke and Robert K. Spear into militancy led to the rise of the militia movement though the 1990s.[18] The movement's anti-government ideology was (and is) spread through speeches at rallies and meetings, books and videotapes sold at gun shows, shortwave and satellite radio, fax networks and computer bulletin boards.[15] However, it is overnight AM radio shows and viral propaganda on the Internet that have most effectively contributed to their extremist political ideas about the New World Order finding their way into the previously apolitical literature of numerous Kennedy assassinologists, ufologists, lost land theorists and, most recently, occultists. From the mid–1990s on, the worldwide appeal of those subcultures transmitted New World Order conspiracism like a "mind virus" to a large new audience of seekers of stigmatized knowledge.[6] Hollywood conspiracy-thriller television shows and films also played a role in introducing a vast popular audience to various fringe theories related to New World Order conspiracism—black helicopters, FEMA "concentration camps", etc.—theories which for decades previously were confined to radical right-wing subcultures. The 1993–2002 television series The X-Files, the 1997 film Conspiracy Theory and the 1998 film The X-Files: Fight the Future are often cited as notable examples.[6]
It uses superfluous language like "mind virus" with no context relating to the paper on mind virus, or any of the sources. The sentances are written weirdly. The whole thing sounds like a personal essay Multilocus ( talk) 16:33, 12 May 2019 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request to
New World Order (conspiracy theory) has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
In the Cold War Era: it is not: "After the fall of COMMUNISM in the early 1990s" This is a perpetuated misconception and ignorance repeatedly made by american authors to instill fear in the readers. It was SOCIALISM. Communism is the aim, the ideal society where there is just one class of the people and total equality is attained. Communism has never been achieved and is a propaganda technique by capitalist agitators to defy the understanding of the happenings in the socialist block behind the iron curtain. It is ignorant to keep naming socialism communism and proves the uneducatedness of the journalist. Thank you. 46.114.38.80 ( talk) 19:30, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
New World Order (conspiracy theory) is a good article that is being improved by supporters of WikiProject Rational Skepticism, which seeks to improve the quality of articles dealing with counterknowledge. Therefore, although remaining neutral, this article will be written from a rational skeptical perspective. Like its name suggests, this article isn't about “new world order” as a paradigm shift in international relations (if you are interested in that subject, I suggest you read and possibly edit the new world order (politics) article instead). It's about conspiracy theories about a “New World Order”. By “ conspiracy theory”, we mean any “a belief which explains an event as the result of a secret plot by exceptionally powerful and cunning conspirators to achieve a malevolent end”. Conspiracy theories are viewed with skepticism because they contrast with institutional analysis of historical or current events, and are rarely supported by conclusive evidence.
Wikipedia's policy on neutral point of view gets misinterpreted to mean neutral to all sides of an issue. In actuality, we only represent viewpoints published by reliable sources and in proportion to the number of reliable sources that express this view. If the majority of reliable sources on a topic are critically positive or negative, then Wikipedia should accurately reflect this viewpoint. Furthermore, the threshold for inclusion in Wikipedia is verifiability, not truth — what counts is whether readers can verify that material added to Wikipedia has already been published by a reliable source, not whether editors think it is true.
That being said, in order for the article to be chosen by the Wikipedia community to become a feature article, I am interested in collaborating with anyone who has created a user account well-written, comprehensive, factually accurate, neutral and stable enough to meet featured article criteria. Creating a user account is extremely useful for an editor (such as giving him or her the ability to more easily watch over pages he or she is interested in) but it also contributes to a culture of relative accountability on Wikipedia. Lastly, as this article gets closer to becoming a featured article, it will most probably become a target for vandalism by anonymous cranks so an administrator will have to semi-protect it to prevent them from editing it, which means even good anonymous editors won't be able to edit it either. -- Loremaster ( talk) 01:16, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
From the Wikipedia:External links guidelines page:
Wikipedia articles may include links to web pages outside Wikipedia, but they should not normally be used in the body of an article. They must conform to certain formatting restrictions. Such pages could contain further research that is accurate and on-topic, information that could not be added to the article for reasons such as copyright or amount of detail, or other meaningful, relevant content that is not suitable for inclusion in an article for reasons unrelated to its accuracy.
Some external links are welcome, but it is not Wikipedia's purpose to include a comprehensive list of external links related to each topic. No page should be linked from a Wikipedia article unless its inclusion is justifiable.
What should be linked
-- Loremaster ( talk) 18:11, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
I have restored the internal links to articles which deal with the various subsections of this article in more detail. No reason, valid or otherwise, has been given for removing these links. Edward321 ( talk) 14:35, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
I have done some research on literature on the topic lately. Even though I have not yet read all these texts, I though I might just suggest them for review and possibly inclusion into the article. Also, I think it would be a good idea to have a list of scientific literature about this topic as well, not only primary sources by conspiracists.
The may also be bits on NWO in
as well as in
Chapters 5 and 6 of Rupert, Mark: Ideologies of Globalization. Contending visions of a New World Order, London, New York 2000, may give hints towards the spread of conspiracism.
There also are an entries on the New World order in Landes, Richard A (ed.): Encyclopedia of Millennialism and Millenial Movements, London, New York 2000 and in Knight, Peter: Conspiracy Theories in American History. An Encyclopedia, Santa Barbara, Denver, Oxford 2003.
I thought I'd just put that up here. As soon as I get to read these in depth, I hope to be able to contribute. Maybe others take an interest in some of these texts. If they are not always suited for this article, I guess they are still relevant for adjacent ones, like conspiracism, for example. 78.55.218.66 ( talk) 06:27, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
So I've added a conspiracy theory section to Lenin biography which keeps getting deleted. I think that's a perfectly valid section to have. What do other people who document conspiracies think? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Berehinia ( talk • contribs) 03:48, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request to
New World Order (conspiracy theory) has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
It should be noted that what you refer to as a "conspiracy theory" is supported with video and audio proof. There are more world leaders speaking of a New World Order than one can imagine. To find this evidence one simply needs to google "politicians speaking about a New World Order. How can this subject be a "conspiracy theory" when such evidence exists? It's more of a conspiracy fact. 208.84.129.57 ( talk) 21:08, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
NSA with google(android, search engine and youtube), apple(smartphones/tablets and computers) and facebook knows everything about us. Whats the conspiracy about this? They even have facial recognition and digital prints to open the phones. Documents from wikileaks and Edward Snowden revealed this.
![]() | This
edit request to
New World Order has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Removed : ‘conspiracy theory’, NWO is now widely published and factual. 2A02:C7D:8C12:9F00:D074:7537:4608:B07A ( talk) 15:32, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
@ Blueboar: Howdy. Just wanted to let you know that I disagree with this revert. Probably an uphill battle since it's a "good article" with lots of editors and opinions. But the section I added is definitely useful and a time saver. Took me a couple of minutes to read through the prose and figure out who was just mentioned vs who actually believed the theory. Which is why I created the section. To save time and concisely present useful information. Thanks. – Novem Linguae ( talk) 14:02, 7 December 2020 (UTC)
Note: Could the page be edited to include the use of the term Neuordnung in Nazi propaganda, referring to a world order due to historical significance? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.22.72.98 ( talk) 17:05, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Could the page reference the occasions where United States President George Bush spoke the words "New World Order" to delineate the use of the phrase as opposed to this conspiracy theory? 76.72.80.157 ( talk) 12:39, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request to
New World Order (conspiracy theory) has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
changee charachterised to charachterized ChristianMorey ( talk) 15:44, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request to
New World Order (conspiracy theory) has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please replace "characterised" with "characterized" because the rest of the article uses American spellings ("stigmatized" and "center" for example, not "stigmatised" and "centre"), so "characterised" is a misspelling in that context. 64.203.186.94 ( talk) 16:53, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request to
New World Order (conspiracy theory) has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please remove
nudging people constantly and covertly in the direction
and add
constantly nudging people covertly in the direction
Thank you. 64.203.186.94 ( talk) 16:51, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request to
New World Order (conspiracy theory) has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
110.175.163.230 ( talk) 05:36, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
This page needs updating to recognize recent events. I think we have to accept the New World Order has arrived. Unlock please, so an open discussion is possible, or are Wiki admins part of the problem?
First at all, an article is about a subject, therefore it is impossible to talk about the article and not to talk about the subject. Second, the NWO is not only a conspiracy, it is something real and the politicians themselves have admitted when talking in formal speeches. 83.38.50.30 ( talk) 20:58, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request to
New World Order (conspiracy theory) has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Correct the reference title "As it True What They Say About Freemasonry" to "Is it True What They Say About Freemasonry", and add S Brent Morris as coauthor. 70.175.192.217 ( talk) 02:58, 11 August 2021 (UTC)
Add "widely discredited" to the opening sentence "The New World Order (NWO) is a conspiracy theory which hypothesizes a secretly emerging totalitarian world government."... On YouTube, the only thing shown to users on videos that are tagged with a link to this is:
"The New World Order (NWO) is a conspiracy theory which hypothesizes a secretly emerging totalitarian world government."
so if a user doesn't click the label/link, that's all they'll see.
![]() | This
edit request to
New World Order (conspiracy theory) has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
2601:18D:8D7F:E084:ED99:38C:C534:242A ( talk) 19:00, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
{{
edit semi-protected}}
template.
ScottishFinnishRadish (
talk)
11:31, 15 August 2021 (UTC)A key Australian Government Official (New South Wales’ chief health officer) stated prima facie that a "New World Order" is upon us.
The title and body of this article should be changed to reflect that this is not a conspiracy theory any longer. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ReturnsGreaterThan ( talk • contribs)
Should the Islamic antichrist, Dajjal, be included?
References
Can we agree to include the speeches if we cut-out the credits/ref to the "not a reliable source", and actually copy the "not a reliable source" integrally, because the "not a reliable source" is using "reliable sources" itself ?
If not, what do you all suggest to improve the article?
-- Mick2 ( talk) 23:42, 1 January 2022 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 23:22, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request to
New World Order (conspiracy theory) has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Potential reference of another aspect of the New World Order, an interview with Zen Benefiel and Dr. Jeffrey Mishlove for New Thinking Allowed. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VU0ZY7p2jhQ&t=1795s Zen Benefiel ( talk) 14:36, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
Dr. Kerry Chant, the Chief Health Officer of New South Wales, sent social media into a frenzy on Thursday, after she referred to a post-lockdown “new world order” during a Covid-19 press conference. 147.161.167.2 ( talk) 01:25, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request to
New World Order (conspiracy theory) has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Another related article: https://mothershipcafe.com/messy-antics Zen Benefiel ( talk) 14:38, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request to
New World Order has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Remove conspiracy theory. There is no way to determine what a conspiracy theory is unless proof with out a doubt has been presented. No such proof has been submitted that proves the new world order is a conspiracy theory therefore it can not be labeled as such Lars860 ( talk) 01:32, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
{{
edit semi-protected}}
template.
ScottishFinnishRadish (
talk)
01:33, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
Hello, I'd like to add a section on The Theosophical Society, which is not really a secret society but one who does publicly state their own creation of a New World Order. Has this been discussed, or may I post and await a comment? — Preceding unsigned comment added by XThe9thSignX ( talk • contribs) 12:13, 23 March 2022 (UTC)
President Biden confirmed that there is a new world order. Please remove this tag. Mouze52 ( talk) 02:54, 22 March 2022 (UTC)
The Lede is supposed to summarize the article and it summarizes the entire article except for the General usage (pre-Cold War) section under History of The Term. This is the first and most important historical fact of the usage of the term that is also covered here by many sources /info/en/?search=New_world_order_(politics). The first revert was because i didnt provide a page and the second revert was because it needed more context. Its placement in the second sentence is the best spot because the third sentence already begins talking about the conspiracies. Foorgood ( talk) 14:21, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
The United States President George HW Bush Jr. constantly mentioned and pushed the term the New world order. The new world order should not be viewed as a conspiracy theory it is a fact. 2600:6C48:777F:A62D:B8B7:352B:21A4:642 ( talk) 13:27, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
How come these two are not at least mentioned in this article? 2A02:2F0B:B705:2600:D992:F46D:DBBB:AD97 ( talk) 17:29, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
The WEF’s Great Reset initiative also became interwoven with similar long-standing conspiratorial themes including those related to a supposed New World Order; or claims associated with Agenda 2030, part of the UN’s Sustainable Development Goals. The initiative has also been adapted to propagate denial and scepticism about the realities of climate change. In this case, it has been used to frame global warming as part of a plot devised to destroy capitalism. According to this narrative, climate action is really meant to control what we own and eat, and ultimately impose totalitarian rule. Narratives mentioning the Great Reset in the run-up to COP27 linked the conspiracy to the energy and cost of living crises, claiming the current situation had been deliberately provoked to facilitate state control.
A phrase that is often used to support the conspiracy that the WEF is planning to strip people of their liberties, possessions and private property is: “You’ll own nothing. And you’ll be happy.” This originates from a 2016 WEF video and a subsequent series of articles by members of the forum’s Global Future Council where they made predictions about what the world would look like in 2030. It included statements like “we won’t transplant organs, we’ll print new ones instead” and “you’ll eat much less meat,” but it was the contribution of Danish MP Ida Auken that grabbed the most attention. Writing from a city in an imaginary future, Auken described a world where technological advancements had made transport, accommodation and food free. “Welcome to the year 2030,” she said. “I don’t own anything. I don’t own a car. I don’t own a house. I don’t own any appliances or any clothes … Everything you considered a product has now become a service.”
The Great Reset has also been a motivating factor toward violence in some cases. In October 2021, the neo-fascist Forza Nuova group took part in violent anti-vaccination protests in Rome and targeted a hospital emergency room as part of their fight against the Great Reset and the country’s green pass (COVID-19 vaccination certificate).
Spread of the Great Reset conspiracy
ISD has tracked the spread of conspiracy theories regarding the Great Reset from the beginning. After the WEF initiative was launched on 3 June 2020, the first video describing the call-to-action as a “New World Order power grab” was posted four days later on alt-tech video platform Bitchute. The video has since been viewed over 100,000 times. Towards the end of June, an op-ed written by Justin Hawkins of the Heartland Institute, a leading climate change-denying think tank, was published on Fox News, in which he wrote the Great Reset’s “socialist outline is clear: destroy the global capitalist economy and reform the Western world.”
https://www.isdglobal.org/explainers/the-great-reset/
Have at it wikiactivists that like to pretend like there are not reliable sources linking the two terms, and go ahead and edit Institute for Strategic Dialogue to prove to other editors how it can't possibly be a reliable source /s.
2A02:2F0B:B500:5A00:8D78:C617:4C54:3B0B ( talk) 14:49, 13 April 2023 (UTC)