New Jersey Route 33 has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Why wouldn't NJ 66 be ok at this page, they split, or would they paralell one another? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nextbarker ( talk • contribs)
Maybe Route 18 isn't that big, the next big exit after that is Route 138. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Nextbarker ( talk • contribs) 15:45, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
Would Business Route 33 be ok on the info box? I would think that's pretty majro, since regular 33 can;t get to the Freehold Raceway or the Mall —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Nextbarker ( talk • contribs) 15:55, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
If I were to add a NJ 79 shields, that wouldn't work out since that's in Freehold, right? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Nextbarker ( talk • contribs) 16:25, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
I guess the mentioning would also apply to the US Route 1 shield on the 287 info because it ends 1 mile from Route 1. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.228.70.72 ( talk • contribs) 17:51, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
Would NJ 34 and NJ 33 intersect in Farmingdale or Howell, NJ
24.228.70.72 04:50, 5 October 2006 (UTC) Nextbarker
Nice job on this article, for a good article Nomination, i suggest adding a history section. Mitch azenia (7500+edits) 01:37, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
There are some problems with this article:
That's all for GA. ( → zel zany - new age roads) 22:53, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
I've failed this mainly because the junction/exit lists are all screwed up; the only freeway section is the Freehold Bypass. You need to use correct section headers and tables, as readers (even I) get confused when it says it is a freeway when it's not. Also, "future improvements" is POV, which isn't allowed. ( → zel zany - new age roads) 20:12, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
With the improvements made since the previous GA nomination, it looks like all the concerns raised before have been addressed. Congratulations! Ƙ ɽɨ ɱρ ᶓȶ 01:05, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
This article has been reviewed as part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force. I believe the article currently meets the criteria and should remain listed as a Good article. The article history has been updated to reflect this review. The main remaining problem with the article at the moment is in the first part of the "Future developments" section, where it is unclear how much of the information that is covered by the first ref, or if this information is actually unreferenced. Lampman ( talk) 19:27, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
So we've got a ~6 mile business loop, which as per WP:USRD/NT typically does not deserve its own article. Sure, the Route description is two paragraphs, but if you read closely, it's full of unnecessary details that road articles aren't supposed to have. WP:NOT an atlas or indiscriminate collection of information. The history should flow nicely into the history section of this article. Thus, the business spur article should be merged here. -- Rschen7754 ( T C) 06:12, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on New Jersey Route 33. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 03:59, 17 February 2018 (UTC)