This article is part of the Canada Roads WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to
roads in
Canadian provinces, territories and counties. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the
project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the
discussion.Canada RoadsWikipedia:WikiProject Canada RoadsTemplate:WikiProject Canada RoadsCanada road transport articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
COMMENT There is no standard provincial highway naming scheme. It does and should go by province, and provinces name things differently.
132.205.44.4320:27, 17 August 2005 (UTC)reply
Wikipedia has a
naming convention, which says that in certain circumstances titles shouldn't be capitalised. "New Brunswick Highway X" is probably incorrect, and "New Brunswick highway X" is an improvement, but I prefer "New Brunswick provincial highway X" because it is more spacific.
AlbertR21:05, 17 August 2005 (UTC)`reply
Excepting capitalization, which is another issue, how does New Brunswick name their provincial highways? That should be the way the article is named. I seem to find "NB Arterial Highway xx", but I doubt that is correct.
132.205.3.2019:04, 18 August 2005 (UTC)reply
After I think about it and after seeing some old maps, there's more that I need to mention. An entirely new alignment was built ca. 1976, and that became 95. The old 5 became 150 and later 555.
Kirjtc219:16, 6 April 2006 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
Image copyright problem with Image:New Brunswick Route 2 (TCH).png
The image
Image:New Brunswick Route 2 (TCH).png is used in this article under a claim of
fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the
requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an
explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check
That there is a
non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
That this article is linked to from the image description page.
I'm not the uploader, but I wasn't aware municipal highway signage was protected by copyright. I was always of the perception that works produced by government agencies were automatically public domain. For example: You don't need licencing from the US Government to air a sound bite from the President, only from whoever *produced* the footage. -
EmiOfBrie (
talk)
06:55, 23 September 2008 (UTC)reply